Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 23;55(7):2180–2187. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00169-17

TABLE 2.

Overall specificity analysis for the Elecsys HTLV-I/II assay and comparator assays in blood donor samples

Parameterb Elecsys HTLV-I/II
Abbott Architect rHTLV-I/II serum Abbott Prism HTLV-I/HTLV-II serum Ortho Avioq HTLV-I/II serum
Total Serum Plasma
No. of samples
    Total 11,574a 9,550a 2,024 5,737a 3,813 2,024
    Negative 11,568 9,546 2,022 5,734 3,812 2,022
    With ≥1 s/co
        IRpos 9 8 1 6 5 3
        IRfpos 6 6 0 5 5 2
        RRpos 9 8 1 6 0 2
        RRfpos 6 6 0 5 0 1
No. of samples with HTLV-1/2 immunoblot assay result/total no. tested
    Positive 0/9 0/8 0/1 0/6 0/0 0/3
    Indeterminate 3/9 2/8 1/1 1/6 0/0 1/3
    Negative 6/9 6/8 0/1 5/6 0/0 2/3
% specificity IR ≥ 1 s/co 99.95 99.94 100 99.91 99.87 99.90
95% confidence limit (two-sided, IR ≥ 1) 99.89–99.98 99.86–99.98 99.82–100 99.80–99.97 99.69–99.96 99.64–99.99
% specificity RR ≥ 1 s/co 99.95 99.94 100 99.91 100 99.95
95% confidence limit (two-sided, RR ≥ 1) 99.89–99.98 99.86–99.98 99.82–100 99.80–99.97 99.90–100 99.72–100
a

One sample excluded from specificity calculations: Elecsys HTLV-I/II reactive; Abbott Architect rHTLV-I/II nonreactive; Fujirebio INNO-LIA HTLV I/II Score reactive, “env gp21 1/2” (“1+”), “env gp46 1/2,” “env gp46-I” (“+/−”). No clarification by nucleic acid technology (NAT) testing or by a sequential bleed was possible due to anonymization of samples.

b

Total, number of analyzed samples; negative, number of true-negative samples (excluding indeterminate, positive, and false-negative samples); IR, initially reactive; IRpos, initially reactive sample, including true-positive samples; IRfpos, initially reactive sample, not including true-positive samples; RR, repeatedly reactive; RRpos, repeatedly reactive sample, including true-positive samples; RRfpos, repeatedly reactive sample, not including true-positive samples; s/co, signal/cutoff ratio.