Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2017 Feb 28;327:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.024

Figure 4.

Figure 4

mPFC and VS win outcome response as a mediator of the relationship between circadian preference and alcohol use. Numbers indicate standardized beta weights, asterisks indicate statistically significant paths, and bold lines indicate paths of interest for the meditational model. Standardized 95% CI for the indirect effect through mPFC: −0.18, −0.01 (s) and VS: −0.08, 0.04 (ns).