Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):750–763. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0968-3

Table 6.

Internal Consistency Reliabilities of RTs (Ns in parentheses) for the Classic Stroop Task

Coefficient Splita Incongruent Congruent Difference
αtrial 1/2/3/4/5/6/ 7/8/9/10/11/12 .76 (81) .61 (132) .21 (68)
αsplit half 1,3,5,7,9,11 / 2,4,6,8,10,12 .73 (155) .61 (156) .40 (155)
αsplit half 1,2,5,6,9,10 / 3,4,7,8,11,12 .73 (156) .59 (156) .38 (156)
αsplit half 1,2,3,7,8,9 / 4,5,6,10,11,12 .75 (156) .56 (156) .34 (156)
αsplit half 1,2,3,4,5,6 / 7,8,9,10,11,12 .67 (155) .54 (156) .14 (155)
αsplit third 1,4,7,10 / 2,5,8,11 / 3,6,9,12 .71 (153) .63 (156) .36 (153)
αsplit third 1,2,7,8 / 3,4,9,10 / 5,6,11,12 .74 (154) .57 (156) .33 (154)
αsplit third 1,2,3,4 / 5,6,7,8 / 9,10,11,12 .70 (155) .57 (156) .23 (155)

Note. Reliabilities were based on a sample of 156 children. For the congruent condition, 146 children responded correctly to 100% of the trials, and 10 children responded correctly to at least 83% but less than 100% of the trials. For the incongruent conditions, 83 children responded correctly to 100% of the trials; 64 children responded correctly to at least 83%, but less than 100% of the trials; and 9 children responded correctly to at least 58%, but less than 83% of the trials.

a

Commas are used to separate trials within a split, and slashes are used to separate splits.