Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 6;20(4):e12423. doi: 10.1111/desc.12423

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) for the within‐groups comparison at four selected electrodes (Fpz, F3, FC1, and Pz). The two conditions (‘baseline’ and ‘congruent’) are compared against each other in the three groups of children (age‐matched ‘CA’, reading‐matched ‘RA’, and dyslexic ‘DYS’). The black bar under each panel indicates times at which there was a significant difference between the two conditions. Statistical differences were assessed with permutation tests (= 2000) corrected for multiple comparisons (Holms method) and an alpha level of 0.05.