Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 3;55(6):794–801. doi: 10.1002/mus.25397

Table 1.

Comparisons of characteristics between patients treated with early fast‐acting treatment (EFT) and non‐EFT strategies (Mann–Whitney U‐test)

EFT group
(n = 249)
Non‐EFT group
(n = 439)
Age (years) 56.6 ± 17.5 58.3 ± 15.0
Women (%)a 71.9 (179/249) 67.9 (298/439)
Duration of immune treatment (years) 6.1 ± 5.0d 11.1 ± 8.8
Age at onset (years) 49.2 ± 18.3 43.9 ± 17.8
Thymectomy (%)a 56.6 (141/249) 63.6 (279/439)
Thymoma (%)a 31.3 (78/249) 23.0 (101/439)
AChR‐Ab positivity (%)a 81.9 (204/249) 85.0 (373/439)
MuSK‐Ab positivity (%)a 4.8 (12/249) 2.5 (11/439)
MGFA classification (%)a (worst, II/III/IV/V) 42.2/31.3/9.2/17.3d 62.2/23.0/4.3/10.5
Bulbar symptoms (%)a (worst) 75.5 (188/249)d 58.8 (258/439)
Current QMG 7.1 ± 5.5b 7.6 ± 4.8
Current MG‐QOL15‐J 13.9 ± 11.4b 15.2 ± 9.9
MM or better at a dose ≤5 mg for ≥6 months, current status (%)a 49.4 (123/249)c 42.1 (185/439)

EFT, early fast‐acting treatment; AChR‐Ab, autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor; MGFA, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; MG‐QOL15‐J, 15‐item MG‐Specific QOL Scale—Japanese version; MM, minimal manifestations; MuSK‐Ab, autoantibodies against muscle‐specific tyrosine kinase; QMG, MGFA quantitative MG score.

a

Chi‐square test.

b

P < 0.05 vs. non‐EFT group.

c

P < 0.001 vs. non‐EFT group.

d

P < 0.0001 vs. non‐EFT group.