Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;44(2):120–127. doi: 10.1111/birt.12273

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of smartphone application survey respondents (2016; n=6141), compared with nationwide population of pregnant women

Demographic characteristics Survey respondents n (%) Nationwide population of pregnant women (%)
Age21
18‐28 4473 (72.8) 68.8
29‐34 1192 (19.4) 21.1
35+ 280 (4.6) 9.1
Missing 196 (3.2) n/a
Region22
Northeast 716 (11.7) 15.9
Southeast 1893 (30.8) 27.2
Midwest 1430 (23.3) 21.0
Southwest 884 (14.4) 14.2
West 1079 (17.6) 21.6
Missing 139 (2.3) n/a
Parity23
Nulliparous 3323 (54.1) 40.0
Parous 2586 (42.1) 60.0
Missing 232 (3.8) n/a
Body mass index (BMI)24
Underweight (<18.5) 255 (4.2) 4.1
Normal weight (18.5‐24.9) 2303 (37.5) 50.9
Overweight (25.0‐29.9) 1414 (23.0) 24.3
Obese (30 and greater) 2169 (35.3) 20.7
Pregnancy risk characteristics
High‐risk pregnancya 2212 (36.0) 42.0
Previous miscarriage24 1868 (30.4) 11.8
Current smoker25 168 (2.7) 8.4
Occupational plans postpartumb , 26
Stay at home 2849 (46.4) 45.8
Work part time 1092 (17.7) 14.9
Work full time 1861 (30.3) 39.3
Missing 339 (5.5) n/a
Gestational age (weeks)
0‐10 1337 (21.8) n/a
11‐20 2393 (39.0) n/a
21‐30 1307 (21.3) n/a
31+ 1104 (18.0) n/a
a

Ovia identifies users with high‐risk pregnancies on the basis of age, BMI, multiple births, and a comprehensive assessment of self‐reported medical history. To most closely replicate Ovia's method of classifying high‐risk pregnancies, we summed the prevalence of high blood pressure, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, obesity, multiple births, and ages 40–44 among pregnant women in the United States.24, 27 Where a range of estimates was provided, we used the midpoint of the range in our summation. This methodology likely yields an overestimate as a result of co‐occurrence of conditions among pregnant women.

b

The nationwide data capture the occupational breakdown of mothers with children under 1 year old.