Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 18;95(4):e270–e277. doi: 10.1111/aos.13354

Table 2.

Summary table of results

Measure Comparison Letter score increase p‐value
BCVA letter score BL to V1 +5.90 <0.001
BCVA letter score BL to V2 +5.14 <0.001
Measure Comparison Log CS increase p‐value
CS 1.5 CPD BL to V1 +0.102 0.0113
CS 1.5 CPD BL to V2 +0.080 0.0558
CS 3.0 CPD BL to V1 +0.109 0.0224
CS 3.0 CPD BL to V2 +0.166 0.0155
CS 6.0 CPD BL to V1 +0.117 0.0029
CS 6.0 CPD BL to V2 +0.10 0.0360
Measure Comparison mm3 decrease p‐value
Drusen volume BL to V1 −0.024 <0.001
Drusen volume BL to V2 −0.029 0.0206
Measure Comparison μm change p‐value
Central drusen thickness BL to V1 −3.78 <0.001
Central drusen thickness BL to V2 −0.34 0.8781
CRT BL to V1 −0.36 0.6872
CRT BL to V2 3.39 0.1422
GA area Comparison mm change p‐value
GA square root BL to V1 −0.021 0.2043
GA square root BL to V2 0.026 0.1618
Measure Comparison mm3 decrease p‐value
RV BL to V1 −0.066 0.1133
RV BL to V2 −0.049 0.4639

BL = baseline, GA = geographic atrophy, early treatment diabetic retinopathy study letter score (BCVA = best‐corrected visual acuity), CS = contrast sensitivity at 1.5, 3.0 and 6.0 cycles per degree (CPD, log units), drusen volume reduction (mm3), central retinal drusen thickness (μm), retinal volume (RV, mm3) and central retinal thickness (CRT, μm).