Table 2.
The percentage of the double‐stained cell populations counted using the epifluorescence microscope
| Semi‐quantitative assessment of double‐stained cells | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham‐treated | LPS‐treated | ||
| SS | CD169pos/iba1pos | 100% | 97% |
| CD169pos/HO‐1pos | 80% | 76% | |
| iba1pos/CD169pos | 100% | 93% | |
| HO‐1pos/CD169pos | 94% | 84% | |
| AP | CD169pos/iba1pos | 100% | 81% |
| CD169pos/HO‐1 pos | 92% | 67% | |
| iba1pos/CD169pos | 56% | 67% | |
| HO‐1 pos/CD169pos | 88% | 65% | |
| DMP | CD169pos/iba1pos | 80% | 86% |
| CD169pos/HO‐1pos | 64% | 82% | |
| iba1pos/CD169pos | 22% | 12% | |
| HO‐1pos/CD169pos | 35% | 34% | |
Cells that stained positive for the stain mentioned before the slash was sampled, and it was recorded how many of those cells that were stained positive for the stain mentioned after the slash.