Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Apr 19;13(5):2053–2071. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00067

Table 5.

Statistical analysis of base-water interaction energies and minimum interaction distances with Drude-2013 and the new Drude force field relative to QM MP2/6-31G*//RIMP2/cc-pVQZ data.

Drude-2013 Drude-New

ΔIE (kcal mol-1)a Δr (Å)b ΔIE (kcal mol-1) Δr (Å)
Me-Ade Avg. Diff.c -0.57 -0.05 -0.43 -0.01
AUEd 1.04 0.15 0.66 0.13
RMSDe 1.30 0.18 0.79 0.16

Me-Cyt Avg. Diff. -0.40 -0.05 -0.20 0.00
AUE 0.78 0.09 0.81 0.11
RMSD 1.08 0.14 1.04 0.14

Me-Gua Avg. Diff. -0.23 -0.04 -0.15 -0.01
AUE 0.74 0.13 0.54 0.13
RMSD 0.85 0.17 0.63 0.17

Me-Thy Avg. Diff. -0.36 -0.07 -0.04 0.01
AUE 0.80 0.10 0.81 0.08
RMSD 1.30 0.13 1.00 0.10
a

Difference in interaction energy between QM value and the result of the calculation with the Drude force field.

b

Difference in minimum interaction distance between QM value and the result of the calculation with the Drude force field.

c

Average difference for all interactions.

d

Absolute unsigned error for all interactions.

e

Root-mean-square difference for all interactions.