Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep 7;23(3):809–818. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2404-z

Table 3. Logistic regression models assessing association of demographics, clinical and provider variables with good vs. bad death.

Parameter Model 2 Model 10
OR P 95% CI OR P 95% CI
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Intercept 1.048 0.968 -- -- 0.425 0.591 -- --
Hospice Involved (vs. Not Involved) 2.595 0.013 1.220 5.520 2.238 0.081 0.906 5.527
Male Respondent (vs. Female) 0.593 0.183 0.278 1.278 0.583 0.262 0.227 1.497
Respondent Age 1.049 0.013 1.010 1.088 1.040 0.065 0.998 1.085
Decedent Age at Death 0.979 0.254 0.943 1.016 0.971 0.170 0.930 1.013
White Respondent (vs. Non-White) 1.279 0.646 0.447 3.659 1.278 0.697 0.372 4.389
Spouse Respondent (vs. Non-Spouse) 0.230 0.024 0.065 0.821 0.148 0.014 0.032 0.679
No Severe Pain (vs. Yes) 2.011 0.289 0.552 7.323
No Severe Stress/Anxiety (vs. Yes) 1.120 0.842 0.367 3.416
Good/Excellent Provider Knowledge/Expertise (vs. Poor/Fair) 3.387 0.026 1.158 9.911
Good/Excellent Provider Compassion (vs. Poor/Fair) 1.070 0.910 0.331 3.458
MD Paid attention to Non-Medical Issues (vs. No Attention) 0.996 0.994 0.357 2.781
No Conflicting Information Received (vs. Yes) 1.515 0.422 0.549 4.178
Wishes Followed (vs. Not Followed) 3.310 0.165 0.610 17.962

Note: Estimates with p-values <.05 are shown in bold. Results from models 1 and 3 through 9 are not shown due to limited space. Data for all models are available from the corresponding author upon request.