Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 26;22(15):3755–3763. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2499

Table 2. Univariate analysis of OS by biomarker status in EMILIA.

CL T-DM1


N Median OS, mo n Median OS, mo Stratified HRa (95% CI)
All patients 496 25.1 495 30.9 0.68 (0.54–0.85)
EGFR mRNA concentration ratio
 ≤Median (0.145) 214 24.6 202 33.9 0.59 (0.42–0.83)
 >Median (0.145) 210 25.2 206 26.5 0.79 (0.56–1.10)
HER2 mRNA concentration ratio
 ≤Median (13.3) 204 23.7 230 26.5 0.80 (0.59–1.09)
 >Median (13.3) 235 24.8 197 34.1 0.53 (0.37–0.76)
HER3 mRNA concentration ratio
 ≤Median (0.438) 218 23.1 214 NE 0.64 (0.47–0.88)
 >Median (0.438) 218 27.1 210 31.9 0.71 (0.51–1.00)
PIK3CA mutation statusb
 Mutated 39 17.3 40 NE 0.26 (0.12–0.57)
 Wild type 87 27.8 93 NE 0.68 (0.40–1.15)
PTEN
 None/decreased/slightly decreased 118 23.6 113 NE 0.52 (0.32–0.86)
 Equivalent/increased 19 14.8 21 NE 0.43 (0.14–1.32)

Abbreviation: NE, not estimable.

a

The following stratification factors were used: world region (U.S., Western Europe, other), number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens (0–1 vs. >1), and site of disease involvement (visceral vs. nonvisceral).

b

Tumors were analyzed for the following mutations: exon 1, R88Q; exon 4, N345K; exon 7, C420R; exon 9, E542K, E545A, E545D, E545G, E545K, and Q546E, Q546K, Q546L, Q546R; exon 20, M1043I, H1047L, H1047R, H1047Y, and G1049R.