Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 10;18(6):1244. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061244

Table 3.

Comparison of investigated methods in terms of lignin type, solvent and antisolvent consumption, yield and stability at different pH and ionic strength values.

Method Source Lignin Type 1 Solvent 2 (L) Antisolvent 2 (L) Yield (%) pH Stability Ionic Strength Stability (mM NaCl)
Solvent shifting (solid particles) [17] AL THF (1) H2O (2.03) - <12 -
[37] KL THF (0.1–1) Dialysis with H2O - 7.4 -
[34] KL THF (0.1–1) Dialysis with H2O - 4–12 <500
[38] OS THF (0.01–0.1) H2O (0.090–2) - - -
[43,56] OS Acetone (0.2) H2O (1.8) - 3.5-8 <70
[40] EHL/OS Acetone/H2O (0.1–10) H2O (0.4–40) - - -
[41] AL/Dioxane Acetone/ H2O (0.1) H2O (0.05) 33–63 - -
[44] EHL DMSO (0.333–0.488) Dialysis with H2O 41–90.9 4–10 -
Solvent shifting (hollow particles) [51] EHL THF (0.5–2) H2O (2–8) - 3.5–12 -
[52] KL THF (0.2–2) H2O (1.8–18) - - -
[54] KL Ethanol (0.4) H2O (3.9) - - -
[53] KL Dioxane (0.3) H2O (2.4) - - -
pH shifting (solid particles) [43,56] KL EG (0.2) 0.025M HNO3 (0.04–0.12) - 2–10.5 <300
[23] EHL EG (0.02) 0.25M HCl (0.05) ~10 - -
[59] AL EG (0.025) 0.1M HCl (0.001) 3 - - -
[16] KL EG (0.02–0.18) 0.25M HCl (0.03) - 6–9 -
[16] KL H2O/NaOH (2) 0.25M HNO3 (0.18) - instable -
[59] AL H2O/NaOH (0.011) 0.25M HNO3 (to pH 1.9) - - -
Mechanical treatment [92] KL H2O (0.2) - - - -
[36] AL H2O (1.4) - - - -
Ice segregation [98] AL DMSO (0.2–5) Dialysis with H2O - 10.5 -
[97] AL H2O/NaOH (3.3–10) - - - -
Aerosol processing [114] AL H2O (0.05–0.2) - >60 - -
KL/OS DMF (0.05–0.2) - >60 - -
Electro-spinning [124] OS Ethanol (0.0013) - - - -
[120] KL/OS/PL/LS DMF (0.001–0.01)H2O (0.001–0.01) - - - -
[129] KL PVA/H2O (0.002) - - - -
CO2 precipitation [135] KL DMF (0.008–0.018) CO2 (0.47–1.89 kg) 51–88.3 - -
[22] OS Acetone (2) CO2 (41 kg) - - -

1 Kraft lignin (KL), Organosolv lignin (OS), Enzymatic hydrolysis lignin (EHL), Lignosulphonate (LS), Pyrolytic Lignin (PL); 2 based on 1 g initial lignin; 3 additional crosslinking with 30 mL 0.4 wt % glutaraldehyde.