Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 14;14(6):640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060640

Table 3.

Meta-Analysis Results.

HeadlineMeta-Analysis Cochran Q I2 Lower Mean Upper
N Statistic p-Value Statistic 95% CI RE OR 95% CI
All included studies 22 p < 0.01 51.4% 1.51 1.74 2.00
Subsample of U.S. studies 11 p < 0.01 66.3% 1.35 1.73 2.21
Subsample of studies of agricultural practices 12 p < 0.01 56.4% 1.47 1.81 2.22
Priyardshi et al. [32] 19 p < 0.01 n.r. 1.49 1.94 2.53
Priyardshi et al. [33] 14 p = 0.01 n.r. 1.31 1.85 2.60
Van Maele-Fabry et al. [34] 12 p < 0.01 74.0% 1.03 1.28 1.59
Allen and Levy [35] 20 p = 0.03 40.0% 1.40 1.66 1.96
Pezzoli and Cereda [36] 51 p = 0.005 67.3% 1.56 1.76 2.04