Table 3.
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients (r: all above diagonal) and Spearman rank correlations (ρ: all below diagonal), their associated p values, the number of animals (N) and Bayes factors (BF). A) Study 1; B) Study 2; C) Study 3. Correlations printed in bold italics have associated probabilities <0.05. Correlations printed in italics have associated probabilities 0.05 < p < 0.10. Bayes factors <0.33 (providing at least substantial evidence for HA; Wetzels and Wagenmakers 2012) or >3 (providing at least substantial evidence for H 0; Wetzels and Wagenmakers 2012) are printed in bold italics
HBT RM Mean |
HBT RM Slope |
HBT WM Mean |
HBT WM Slope |
JBT Sess. to crit. |
JBT % opt. choices |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | |||||||
HBT RM Mean |
r | – | 0.957 | 0.661 | 0.085 | 0.072 | 0.344 |
P< | – | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.755 | 0.798 | 0.210 | |
N | – | 16 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 15 | |
BF | – | <0.001 | 0.093 | 3.096 | 3.052 | 1.540 | |
HBT RM Slope |
r | – | 0.687 | 0.260 | 0.037 | 0.446 | |
P< | – | 0.003 | 0.331 | 0.895 | 0.096 | ||
N | – | 16 | 16 | 15 | 15 | ||
BF | – | 0.065 | 2.136 | 3.097 | 0.853 | ||
HBT WM Mean |
r | – | 0.309 | −0.099 | 0.329 | ||
P< | – | 0.244 | 0.725 | 0.232 | |||
N | – | 16 | 15 | 15 | |||
BF | – | 1.712 | 2.970 | 1.622 | |||
HBT WM Slope |
r | – | 0.013 | 0.291 | |||
P< | – | 0.963 | 0.293 | ||||
N | – | 15 | 15 | ||||
BF | – | 3.140 | 1.896 | ||||
JBT Sess. to crit. |
r | – | 0.300 | ||||
P< | – | 0.278 | |||||
N | – | 15 | |||||
BF | – | 1.830 | |||||
JBT % opt. choices |
r | – | |||||
P< | – | ||||||
N | – | ||||||
BF | – |
B* | |||||||
HBT RM Mean |
r | – | 0.834 | 0.308 | 0.237 | 0.018 | −0.040 |
P< | – | <0.001 | 0.064 | 0.157 | 0.917 | 0.813 | |
N | – | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
BF | – | <0.001 | 0.932 | 1.867 | 4.861 | 4.756 | |
HBT RM Slope |
r | 0.830 | – | 0.258 | 0.266 | 0.175 | 0.023 |
P< | <0.001 | – | 0.124 | 0.111 | 0.300 | 0.895 | |
N | 37 | – | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
BF | – | – | 1.563 | 1.440 | 2.915 | 4.845 | |
HBT WM Mean |
r | 0.358 | 0.295 | – | −0.233 | 0.024 | 0.042 |
P< | 0.030 | 0.076 | – | 0.164 | 0.889 | 0.805 | |
N | 37 | 37 | – | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
BF | – | – | – | 1.926 | 4.841 | 4.746 | |
HBT WM Slope |
r | 0.174 | 0.231 | −0.288 | – | 0.412 | 0.052 |
P< | 0.304 | 0.168 | 0.084 | – | 0.011 | 0.762 | |
N | 37 | 37 | 37 | – | 37 | 37 | |
BF | – | – | – | – | 0.223 | 4.675 | |
JBT Sess. to crit. |
r | −0.003 | 0.170 | 0.033 | 0.405 | – | 0.076 |
P< | 0.987 | 0.316 | 0.845 | 0.013 | – | 0.656 | |
N | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | – | 37 | |
BF | – | – | – | – | – | 4.442 | |
JBT % opt. choices |
r | −0.088 | −0.073 | 0.108 | 0.026 | 0.023 | – |
P< | 0.604 | 0.667 | 0.524 | 0.878 | 0.892 | – | |
N | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | – | |
BF | – | – | – | – | – | – |
C | |||||||
HBT RM Mean |
r | – | 0.750 | 0.458 | 0.008 | −0.187 | 0.005 |
P< | – | <0.001 | 0.042 | 0.973 | 0.459 | 0.985 | |
N | – | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 18 | |
BF | – | 0.004 | 0.524 | 3.611 | 2.658 | 3.432 | |
HBT RM Slope |
r | – | 0.564 | −0.079 | 0.120 | 0.189 | |
P< | – | 0.010 | 0.741 | 0.637 | 0.451 | ||
N | – | 20 | 20 | 18 | 18 | ||
BF | – | 0.158 | 3.433 | 3.094 | 2.636 | ||
HBT WM Mean |
r | – | −0.095 | 0.054 | −0.080 | ||
P< | – | 0.689 | 0.830 | 0.751 | |||
N | – | 20 | 18 | 18 | |||
BF | – | 3.352 | 3.360 | 3.275 | |||
HBT WM Slope |
r | – | 0.073 | −0.426 | |||
P< | – | 0.772 | 0.078 | ||||
N | – | 18 | 18 | ||||
BF | – | 3.301 | 0.811 | ||||
JBT Sess. to crit. |
r | – | 0.354 | ||||
P< | – | 0.149 | |||||
N | – | 18 | |||||
BF | – | 1.304 | |||||
JBT % opt. choices |
r | – | |||||
P< | – | ||||||
N | – | ||||||
BF | – |
Note that the product-moment correlations and the rank correlations are highly similar
HBT holeboard task, JBT judgement bias task, RM reference memory, WM working memory, sess. to crit. sessions to criterion, % opt. choices percentage optimistic choices
* The JBT % optimistic choices in study 2 (panel B) were not normally distributed (Shapiro Wilk test: p = 0.0032). Therefore, below diagonal, the Spearman rank correlations (ρ) are shown