Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;13(3):418–429. doi: 10.1007/s12015-017-9737-1

Table 1.

An overview of tissue-engineered 3D skin models from human primary cells and their limitations

Model Commercial available Advantages/disadvantages Ref.
Reconstructed epidermis Yes: EpiDerm™, EpiSkin™, SkinEthic™, epiCS®
No: in house models
+: differentiated epidermis from keratinocytes
-: only keratinocytes, no dermal compartment present or immune cells
[80, 81]
Pigmented Reconstructed epidermis Yes: MelanoDerm
No: in house models
+: pigmented differentiated epidermis from keratinocytes and melanocytes
-: no living dermal compartment, immune cells, adipose tissue, appendages or blood vessels present
[27, 82]
Full-thickness skin models Yes: EpiDerm-FT, Phenion-FT, LabSkin
No: in house models
+: differentiated epidermis on fibroblast-populated dermis
-: no immune cells, adipose tissue, appendages or blood vessels
[8386]
Three layered skin model No: in house models +: differentiated epidermis on fibroblast-populated dermis on a adipocyte /ASC populated hypodermis
-: no immune cells or appendages
[1618]
Full-thickness skin model containing EC No: in house models +: differentiated epidermis on fibroblast and endothelial cell (show vessel like structures) populated dermis
-: no immune cells, adipose tissue, appendages or perfused blood vessels
[14, 15]
Skin equivalent with integrated Langerhans Cells No: in house model +: pigmented skin model containing functional MUTZ-3 derived Langerhans
-: no adipose tissue, appendages or blood vessels
[19, 20]

ASC adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells