Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;23(3):743–768. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9829-3

Table 2.

The scope and matter of an ethics review in epidemiological studies

Symbol Name Title of guidelines
Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiologists (IEF-EGE) American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines (ACEEG) Good Epidemiological Practice. IEA Guidelines for proper conduct in epidemiological research (IEA-GEP) Guidelines for Good Phamacoepidemiology Practices (GGPP) International Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies (CIOMS-IEGES)
A. Information policy
A1 Scope/content/procedures of obtaining informed consent X X X
A2 Scope/content/procedures of obtaining proxy consent X
A3 Scope/content/procedures of obtaining assent/agreement of incapable subjects X
A4 Deviation from standard written informed consent form X X X
A5 Withholding information, deception of the subject, debriefing X X
A6 Access to information (including clinical and personal data) collected in the course of study X
A7 Communication with subjects, who did not give their IC X X
A8 Communication with community; community consultation and involvement X
A9 Communication of results to media and general public X X
A10 Communication of results in scientific journals X
B. Protection of subjects
B1 Subjects’ rights, well-being, and safety X X X
B2 Proper balance between risk and benefits for subjects and the public X X X
B3 Report of adverse events (physical and/or psychological) X
B4 Equitable enrollment of subjects X X
B5 Use of placebo/no-treatment X
B6 Exceptional breach of confidentiality X
B7 Waiver of informed consent (also in research utilizing existing personal information/specimen) X X X X
B8 Procedures protecting subjects’ privacy and confidentiality X X X
B9 Collecting, use, reuse, sharing exchanging, and final destination of data (personal information and/or biospecimens, genetic information) X X X
B10 Anonymization of data/biospecimens X
B11 Request for removal of data from the study X
B12 Safeguards protecting vulnerable subjects X X X
B13 Payment, reimbursement, medical services in the study, compensation X
B14 Plans for studies in emergency X
B15 IRB/REC from sponsoring country reviews research protocol in host country X
B16 IRB/REC from host country ensures that all ethical provisions are met and study is in accordance with local values X
C. Guards for research integrity
C1 All ethical aspects of the study X X X
C2 Scientific merit of the study X X
C3 Oversight of the study conduct X X X
C4 Significance of observational character of most epidemiological studies X X
C5 Improving ethical/scientific/operational aspects of studies X X
C6 Conflict of interests X X
C7 Ethical approval X X X
C8 Reporting unethical behavior and/or misconduct X
D. Formal and operational requirements
D1 Independence X X
D2 Rules of proceeding X X X
D3 Communication of proceeding rules X
D4 Obstruction of the study X X
D5 Disclosure and avoidance of conflict of interest X X
D6 Adequate composition of membership X X
D7 Periodical replacement of members X
D8 Respecting sponsors’ rights X X
D9 Different levels of functioning (local/national/international) X X
D10 Appeal procedure X
D11 Fast-track review X X
D12 Cooperation between IRBs/RECs X X
E. Types of studies
E1 Studies involving human beings X X X X
E2 Use of identifiable data without informed consent X X
E3 Use of human specimens without informed consent X X X
E4 Studies of unclear nature X
E5 Sensitive topics studies X
E6 Studies using clinical data without informed consent X X
E7 Studies using publicly available data X
E8 Minimal risk X X
E9 Studies using anonymized data/specimens X X
E10 Studies without informed consent regulated by local laws X X
E11 Public health, routine surveillance X X
E12 Studies in emergency, acute communicable diseases X X
E13 Simple aggregation of records
Numbers of categories mentioned in the guidelines 21 18 13 5 55
Symbol Name Title of guidelines
Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Research (JAPAN-EGES) Ethical Guidelines for Observational Studies: Observational research, audits, and related activities. Revised edition (NEW-ZEALAND-EGOS) Ethical Guidelines for Environmental Epidemiologists (EGEE) Number of guidelines mentioning the category
A. Information policy
A1 Scope/content/procedures of obtaining informed consent X X X 6
A2 Scope/content/procedures of obtaining proxy consent X 2
A3 Scope/content/procedures of obtaining assent/agreement of incapable subjects X 2
A4 Deviation from standard written informed consent form X X 5
A5 Withholding information, deception of the subject, debriefing 2
A6 Access to information (including clinical and personal data) collected in the course of study 1
A7 Communication with subjects, who did not give their IC X 3
A8 Communication with community; community consultation and involvement X X 3
A9 Communication of results to media and general public X 3
A10 Communication of results in scientific journals 1
B. Protection of subjects
B1 Subjects’ rights, well-being, and safety X X X 6
B2 Proper balance between risk and benefits for subjects and the public X X 5
B3 Report of adverse events (physical and/or psychological) 1
B4 Equitable enrollment of subjects X 3
B5 Use of placebo/no-treatment 1
B6 Exceptional breach of confidentiality X 2
B7 Waiver of informed consent (also in research utilizing existing personal information/specimen) X X X 7
B8 Procedures protecting subjects’ privacy and confidentiality X X X 6
B9 Collecting, use, reuse, sharing exchanging, and final destination of data (personal information and/or biospecimens, genetic information) X X X 6
B10 Anonymization of data/biospecimens 1
B11 Request for removal of data from the study 1
B12 Safeguards protecting vulnerable subjects X X 5
B13 Payment, reimbursement, medical services in the study, compensation X 2
B14 Plans for studies in emergency 1
B15 IRB/REC from sponsoring country reviews research protocol in host country X 2
B16 IRB/REC from host country ensures that all ethical provisions are met and study is in accordance with local values X 2
C. Guards for research integrity
C1 All ethical aspects of the study X X 5
C2 Scientific merit of the study X X 4
C3 Oversight of the study conduct X X 5
C4 Significance of observational character of most epidemiological studies 2
C5 Improving ethical/scientific/operational aspects of studies X 3
C6 Conflict of interests X X X 5
C7 Ethical approval X X 5
C8 Reporting unethical behavior and/or misconduct 1
D. Formal and operational requirements
D1 Independence 2
D2 Rules of proceeding X X 5
D3 Communication of proceeding rules X X 3
D4 Obstruction of the study X 3
D5 Disclosure and avoidance of conflict of interest X X 4
D6 Adequate composition of membership X X 4
D7 Periodical replacement of members 1
D8 Respecting sponsors’ rights X 3
D9 Different levels of functioning (local/national/international) X 3
D10 Appeal procedure 1
D11 Fast-track review X X 4
D12 Cooperation between IRBs/RECs X X 4
E. Types of studies
E1 Studies involving human beings X 5
E2 Use of identifiable data without informed consent X X X 5
E3 Use of human specimens without informed consent X X X 6
E4 Studies of unclear nature 1
E5 Sensitive topics studies 1
E6 Studies using clinical data without informed consent X 3
E7 Studies using publicly available data 1
E8 Minimal risk X X 4
E9 Studies using anonymized data/specimens X 3
E10 Studies without informed consent regulated by local laws X X 4
E11 Public health, routine surveillance X X 4
E12 Studies in emergency, acute communicable diseases X 3
E13 Simple aggregation of records X 1
Numbers of categories mentioned in the guidelines 36 12 28