Table 3.
Trial | Agents | Design | Number | Median age | Median PFS (months) | Median follow-up (months) | MRD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REACH [2] | FCR vs. FC | Open label | 552 | 62.5 | 30.6 vs. 20.6 months (p < 0.001) | 25 | 13 vs. 12% |
RESONATE [37] | Ibrutinib vs. ofatumumab | Open label | 391 | 67 | Not reached vs. 8.1 months | 9.4 | n/a |
Furman 2014 [52] | Idelalisib + rituximab vs. rituximab | Double-blind | 220 | 71 | Not reached vs. 5.5 months | 3.8 and 2.9a | n/a |
HELIOS [74] | Ibrutinib + BR vs. BR | Double-blind | 578 | 63.5 | Not reached vs. 13.3 (p < 0.0001) | 17 | 18 vs. 5% (p = 0.0011) |
Zelenetz 2015 [75] | Idelalisib + BR vs. BR | Double-blind | 416 | 58% <65 years | 23 vs. 11 (p < 0.0001) | 12 | n/a |
COMPLEMENT 2 [19] | Ofatumumab + FC vs. FC | Open label | 365 | 61 | 28.9 vs. 18.8 (p = 0.0032) | 34 | 21 vs. 8% (p = 0.0006) |
Jones 2016 [76] | Idelalisib + ofatumumab vs. ofatumumab | Open label | 261 | 67 | 16.4 vs. 8.0 (p < 0.0001) | 12.3 | n/a |
aTime receiving study drug