Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 21;28(6):1277–1292. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2609-9

Table 3.

Class-wise performance of the ESN and RF on the fixed test dataset (n=321) in experiment 4

PRC REC SPC F1-score
φ0=0 rnd. φ0 |Δ| φ0=0 rnd. φ0 |Δ| φ0=0 rnd. φ0 |Δ| φ0=0 rnd. φ0 |Δ|
C1 ESN 0.791 0.791 0.000 0.928 0.928 0.000 0.934 0.934 0.000 0.853 0.853 0.000
n1=69 RF 0.903 0.868 0.035 0.942 0.957 0.015 0.972 0.960 0.012 0.922 0.910 0.012
C2 ESN 0.897 0.897 0.000 0.625 0.625 0.000 0.985 0.985 0.000 0.737 0.737 0.000
n2=56 RF 0.946 0.939 0.007 0.625 0.554 0.071 0.992 0.992 0.000 0.753 0.697 0.056
C3 ESN 0.929 0.912 0.017 0.853 0.853 0.000 0.985 0.985 0.000 0.889 0.881 0.008
n3=61 RF 0.889 0.803 0.086 0.918 0.869 0.049 0.973 0.950 0.023 0.903 0.835 0.068
C4 ESN 0.853 0.865 0.012 0.985 0.985 0.000 0.957 0.961 0.004 0.914 0.921 0.007
n4=65 RF 0.785 0.763 0.022 0.954 0.892 0.062 0.934 0.930 0.004 0.861 0.823 0.038
Cbg ESN 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000
nbg=69 RF 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000
w.m. ESN 0.894 0.893 0.001 0.888 0.888 0.000 0.971 0.971 0.000 0.884 0.884 0.000
n=321 RF 0.905 0.876 0.029 0.897 0.866 0.031 0.974 0.966 0.008 0.894 0.860 0.034

The last row contains the weighted mean (w.m.) of the measures according to the class distribution in the test set. The differences between the performance at the default (φ=0) and the random starting angle (rnd. φ0) are computed as absolute differences |Δ|. The ESN recognized the same cells under different rotation angles more constantly. Superior results are printed in bold. The best hyper-parameters of the classifiers were chosen according to the best cross-validation results of experiment 2 (ESN: N=4000, RF: forest size =128, maximum tree depth =12)