Table 1.
BIC | ϕ | c | λ | α | W | |||||||
Chance | 1,663 | (0) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
RL-baseline | 1,401 | (334) | 0.54 | (0.41) | –0.92 | (2.93) | – | – | – | – | – | – |
RL-lambda | 1,253 | (318) | 0.40 | (0.40) | 0.24 | (2.10) | 0.88 | (1.69) | – | – | – | – |
RL-PVL | 1,195 | (291) | 0.41 | (0.37) | 1.43 | (1.39) | 0.98 | (1.83) | 0.50 | (0.36) | – | – |
RL-EVL | 1,267 | (329) | 0.52 | (0.40) | 0.32 | (2.25) | – | – | – | – | 0.64 | (0.8) |
BIC | p(stay|win) | p(shift|loss) | θ p(shift|loss) | θ p(stay|win) | ||||||||
WSLS | 723 | (324) | 0.58 | (0.30) | 0.63 | (0.31) | 0.21 | (0.22) | 0.25 | (0.26) |
Note. Values in parentheses are standard deviations. The RL-lambda, RL-PVL, and RL-EVL models include loss aversion parameters (λ and W). Values larger than 1 on these parameters would indicate loss aversion