Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;24(3):776–797. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1174-7

Table 2.

Estimates using different numbers of sampling points (n). Upper row for each parameter (in gray) corresponds to the estimates given in the main text

graphic file with name 13423_2016_1174_Tab2_HTML.jpg

As is apparent, reducing the number of points does not cause estimates to deteriorate greatly. The two significant variations in measurements are in bold; these were for 2-point estimates of b disc, for low densities and high aspect ratios, which were significantly higher than those for large numbers of sampling points. Square brackets indicate 95 % CIs. To reduce clutter, leading zeroes have been omitted