Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;24(7):1811–1820. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3

Table 4.

Prognostic factors on uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis for disease-free survival

HR (95% CI) P value
Univariate analysis
 Group 2 1.509 (0.959–2.375) 0.075
 Celiac lymph node metastasis 3.898 (1.923–7.904) 0.000
 Cardia growth 2–4 cm 1.454 (0.742–2.849) 0.275
 Length >8 cm 1.103 (0.580–2.097) 0.764
 Weight loss >10% 1.229 (0.720–2.096) 0.450
 Female 0.484 (0.255–0.920) 0.027
 Squamous cell carcinoma 0.366 (0.167–0.802) 0.012
 cT1 and T2 1.000 0.084
 cT3 1.961 (1.003–3.833)
 cT4a 2.894 (0.984–8.510)
 ypT0 1.000 0.023
 ypT1 1.535 (0.636–3.706)
 ypT2 3.056 (1.298–7.194)
 ypT3 2.632 (1.275–5.435)
 ypN0 1.000 0.001
 ypN1 1.470 (0.812–2.659)
 ypN2 3.060 (1.618–5.785)
 ypN3 4.374 (1.682–11.375)
 R1 resection 4.389 (2.043–9.431) 0.000
 LN ratio (>0.2 LN +) 3.106 (1.758–5.489) 0.000
 Perineural growth 1.694 (0.993–2.890) 0.053
 Lymphangio-invasion 1.940 (1.131–3.327) 0.016
Multivariate analysisa
 Female 0.474 (0.248–0.907) 0.024
 Squamous cell carcinoma 0.413 (0.185–0.923) 0.031
 Group 2 1.685 (1.061–2.676) 0.027
 LN ratio (>0.2 LN +) 2.712 (1.524–4.826) 0.001

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, cT clinical T stage, ypT pathologic T stage, ypN pathologic lymph node stage, LN lymph node

PUB1: OK not to spell PET/CT here? Spelling here would be cumbersome

aVariables with P < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis