Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 6;28(7):983–987. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3216-0

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis

Stage 2 cystocele Stage 3 or 4 cystocele OR (95% CI) P -value
n n or Mean (% or range) n n or Mean (% or range)
Age (years) 137 55.1 (31–83) 132 61.3 (39–87) 1.07 (1.04–1.10) <0.01
BMI (kg/m2) 119 26.0 (18.4–41.9) 122 26.0 (17.5–35.2) 1.00 (0.93–1.07) 1.00
Vaginal delivery (n) 129 2.3 (0–4) 129 2.3 (0–9) 1.05 (0.83–1.34) 0.67
Assisted delivery (yes/no), n (%) 129 15 (11.6%) 129 16 (12.4%) 1.08 (0.51–2.28) 0.85
Family history of POP (yes/no), n (%) 128 51 (39.8%) 124 58 (46.8%) 1.33 (0.81–2.19) 0.27
Concurrent rectocele (yes/no), n (%) 136 63 (46.3%) 132 52 (39.4%) 0.76 (0.47–1.24) 0.28
Concurrent uterine of vaginal vault prolapse (yes/no), n (%) 137 79 (57.7%) 132 82 (62.1%) 1.20 (0.74–1.96) 0.46
Major levator defect (yes/no), n (%) 133 58 (43.6%) 129 61 (47.3%) 1.16 (0.71–1.89) 0.55
Hiatus during Valsalva (cm2), mean (range) 130 33.0 (16.8–58.5) 126 33.5 (18.9–67.4) 1.01 (0.98–1.04) 0.59

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BMI body mass index, POP pelvic organ prolapse