Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;28(6):1965–1977. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3986-3

Table 4.

Deterministic sensitivity analyses

Scenario Incremental Costa Incremental Effect ICERa
Base case 11 0.0012 9167
Exclude “other” fractures 0 0.0014 0
Intervention costs
 25% decrease 0 0.0012 0
 25% increase 22 0.0012 18,440
Persistence with treatment
 30%, rather than 60% 34 0.0006 56,667
Adherence with treatment
 50%, rather than 80% 57b 0.0004 142,500
Bisphosphonate price
 100% increase 31 0.0012 25,833
 200% increase 51 0.0012 42,500
 500% increase 111 0.0012 92,500
Effect of bisphosphonate 35% fracture reduction 31 0.0008 38,750
Discount rate (rather than 3%)
 0% discount rate −30 0.0020 nab
 1% discount rate −13 0.0016 nab
 5% discount rate 26 0.0009 28,889
Mortality benefit (11% reduction) 12 0.0021 5714
Increased mortality 1 year post-spine fracture 11 0.0013 8462

QALYs quality-adjusted life years, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

aCosts are expressed in constant 2014 Canadian dollars (multiply by 0.905 to convert to 2014 US dollars [28])

bThe ICER is not applicable since the intervention dominates usual care, i.e., the intervention is less costly and more effective