Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Process. 2012 Aug 28;28(5):701–716. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.682071

TABLE 1.

Summary of the “identity across levels” studies. In the identity condition the distractor word (e.g., rose) corresponds to the identity of the picture target (“rose”) and the response is located at a different level of categorisation (e.g., “flower”). In the unrelated condition the distractor word (e.g., car) is semantically unrelated to the target picture. The reported data corresponds to the condition SOA –0 ms, see main text for details. Effect size corresponds to RTsIdentity condition minus RTsUnrelated condition

Task Target (preferred name) Response Identity condition Unrelated condition Effect size (ms) Study
Categorisation Flower “Plant” Flower Car(active category) −13 Lupker & Katz (1981) Exp.2
Categorisation Flower “Plant” Flower Car(inactive category) −12 Lupker & Katz (1981) Exp.2
Categorisation Flower “Plant” Flower Car 16 Glaser & Düngelhoff (1984) Exp.2
Subordinate Rose “Rose” Flower Car −45 Vitkovitch & Tyrrel (1999) Exp.2
Basic Flower(picture of a rose) “Flower” Rose Jeep 42 Hantsch et al. (2005) Exp.1
Basic Flower(picture of a rose) “Flower” Rose Jeep 39 Hantsch et al. (2005) Exp.2
Subordinate Flower(picture of a rose) “Rose” Flower Car 28 Hantsch et al. (2005) Exp.3
Subordinate Flower(picture of a rose) “Rose” Flower Car 18 Hantsch et al. (2009) Exp.1
Subordinate Flower(picture of a rose) “Rose” Flower Car 25 Hantsch et al. (2009) Exp.2
Subordinate Flower(picture of a rose) “Rose” Flower Car 2 Hantsch et al. (2009) Exp.3
Subordinate Flower(picture of a rose) “Rose” Flower Car −14 Hantsch et al. (2009) Exp.4
Basic Rose “Flower” Rose Jeep 14 Hantsch & Madebach (2013)