Skip to main content
. 2017 May-Jun;50(3):162–169. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0176

Table 2.

Estimates obtained in the potential model for fluoroscopy time.

  Fluoroscopy time estimated for the first injection   Slope of the curve   Quality of the adjustment  
Volunteer α Standard error   β Standard error   R2 Learning rate
1 2.999 0.802   -0.293 0.124   0.283 81.6%
2 1.862 0.441   -0.335* 0.114   0.397 79.3%
3 1.640 0.299   -0.308 0.088   0.465 80.8%
4 1.315 0.415   -0.319 0.153   0.250 80.2%
5 1.086 0.187   -0.262 0.083   0.413 83.4%
6 0.818 0.192   -0.253* 0.113   0.262 83.9%
7 1.215 0.185   -0.374 0.074   0.648 77.2%
8 1.088 0.153   -0.354 0.068   0.657 78.2%
9 0.898 0.102   -0.359 0.055   0.754 78.0%
10 1.165 0.113   -0.355 0.047   0.803 78.2%
11 1.494 0.254   -0.545 0.082   0.757 68.5%
12 0.942 0.087   -0.362 0.045   0.824 77.8%
Mean 1.38   -0.34   0.54 78.9%
Standard deviation 0.60   0.07   0.22 3.9%
Coefficient of variation 43.38%   21.81%   40.73% 5.0%
*

p ≤ 0.05,

p ≤ 0.01 and

p ≤ 0.001 for the hypothesis β = 0.