TABLE 3.
Lanea | Samplea | Densityb |
---|---|---|
1 | λ910 | 1 |
2 | λ900 Rzam Rz1am | 0.027 |
3 | λ910 RzD65G | 0.62 |
4 | λ910 RzD65G S20P | 0.31 |
5 | λ910 RzD65G A22D | 0.51 |
6 | λ910 RzD65G A30V | 0.51 |
7 | λ910 RzD65G R37C | 0.39 |
8 | λ910 RzD65G Rz1I39F | 0.34 |
9 | λ910 RzQ151R | 0.98 |
10 | λ910 RzQ151R Y26S | 0.82 |
11 | λ910 Rz1P35H | 1.0 |
12 | λ910 RzA30V Rz1P35H | 0.87 |
13 | λ910 RzR37C Rz1P35H | 0.85 |
14 | λ910 RzR37H Rz1P35H | 0.73 |
Lanes and samples are arranged corresponding to Fig. 9.
The density value of the band corresponding to the expected Rz molecular mass is reported. Each density measurement was normalized to that of the loading control. The highest value of each blot was set to 1. Density readings were proportionally scaled to this value.