Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 19;56(7):803–813. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2

Table 5.

Bioequivalence analysis of dose proportionality for AAFP 125 and 625 mg after dose normalization to 500 mg

PK parameters Average (raw data) ANOVA model-based least-square mean (log scale)
AAFP 125 mg AAFP 500 mg Ratio (%) AAFP 125 mg AAFP 500 mg Mean difference (90% CI) Geometric mean ratio (90% CI of ratio)
AUC0–∞ 448.472 436.075 107.4 5.970 5.946 0.024 (−0.077, 0.125) 1.024 (0.926–1.133)a
AUC0–t 410.206 414.087 104.0 5.869 5.886 −0.017 (−0.125, 0.091) 0.983 (0.882–1.096)a
C max 112.884 82.452 155.2 4.583 4.303 0.28 (0.113, 0.447) 1.323 (1.119–1.564)
PK parameters Average (raw data) ANOVA model-based least-square mean (log scale)
AAFP 625 mg AAFP 500 mg Ratio (%) AAFP 625 mg AAFP 500 mg Mean difference (90% CI) Geometric mean ratio (90% CI of ratio)
AUC0–∞ 394.271 438.023 96.9 5.881 5.946 −0.065 (−0.165, 0.035) 0.937 (0.848–1.035)a
AUC0–t 375.011 416.232 97.9 5.826 5.886 −0.060 (−0.167, 0.047) 0.942 (0.846–1.048)a
C max 83.931 84.159 105.6 4.276 4.303 −0.027 (−0.192, 0.138) 0.973 (0.826–1.148)a

AAFP abiraterone acetate fine particle, ANOVA analysis of variance, AUC 0 area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity, AUC 0t area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, CI confidence interval, C max maximum plasma concentration, PK pharmacokinetic

aThe 90% CI fell within the recommended 0.800–1.250 limits of bioequivalence when analyzed on a log scale