Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;177(2):195–205. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-0905

Table 1.

Patients baseline characteristics in the phase II study (FAS). Data are presented as mean ± s.d. or as n (%).

PEG-rhGH 0.1 mg/kg/week (LD) PEG-rhGH 0.2 mg/kg/week (HD) Daily rhGH 0.25 mg/kg/week P value
n 32 31 34
Chronological age (year) 10.91 ± 3.31 11.75 ± 3.95 10.54 ± 4.05 0.4507b
BA (year)
 Male 6.19 ± 2.20 7.65 ± 2.42 6.16 ± 2.51 0.0518b
 Female 5.51 ± 1.54 5.60 ± 1.50 4.81 ± 2.16 0.6046b
Sex, n (%) 0.4907a
 Male 23 (71.88) 25 (80.65) 23 (67.65)
 Female 9 (28.3) 6 (19.35) 11 (32.35)
Weight (kg) 20.50 ± 7.23 23.01 ± 7.01 20.18 ± 6.06 0.1947b
Height (cm) 110.18 ± 12.84 116.45 ± 11.69 110.42 ± 14.59 0.1050b
MPH (cm) 164.95 ± 8.53 167.32 ± 6.56 165.38 ± 6.74 0.3101b
HV (cm/year) 2.58 ± 0.87 2.86 ± 0.80 2.70 ± 0.92 0.4468b
IGF1 SDS −2.44 ± 0.50 −2.13 ± 1.09 −2.33 ± 0.81 0.3480b
HTSDS −4.84 ± 1.59 −4.50 ± 2.20 −4.48 ± 1.48 0.6519b
Corrected HTSDS −5.02 ± 1.86 −4.62 ± 2.16 −4.55 ± 1.77 0.5701b
Pituitary gland MRI, n (%) 0.9721a
 Normal 16 (50.00) 15 (48.39) 16 (47.06)
 Abnormalc 16 (50.00) 16 (51.61) 18 (52.94)
 IGHD/MPHD (n/n) 29/3 27/4 30/4 0.9210b
a

Differences between the two groups were compared using bidirectional Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH)-χ2 test. bDifferences among the three groups were compared using the t-test or the χ2 test. cPituitary hypoplasia.

BA, bone age; FAS: Full analysis set; HTSDS, height standard deviation score; HV, height velocity; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP-3, IGF-binding protein-3; IGHD, isolated growth hormone deficiency; MPH, mid-parental height; MPHD, multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.