Skip to main content
. 2017 May 8;40(2):530–539. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0180

Table 3. Summary of sequence variation in the promoter and coding regions of the MC1R gene in four population groups composed of autochthonous populations from the 1000 Genomes project and results of three neutrality tests based on sequence data: Tajima’s D test, Fu’s F S test, and synonymous and non-synonymous nucleotide substitution test (dN - dS) of positive and purifying selection for analysis averaging MC1R coding haplotypes. Significant p-values are marked in boldface.

Tajima’s D test Fu’s F S test dN / dS nucleotide substitution test
2n a Number of nucleotide sites K b S c θW ± SD π ± SD (%)d D p-valuee F S p-valuef Number of codons HA = Positive Selection HA = Purifying Selection
(dN > dS) (dN < dS)
Promoter region
AFR 1008 3001 78 55 6.140 ± 1.367 0.224 ± 0.117 -0.991 0.152 -24.074 0.003 - - -
EAS 1008 3001 42 45 4.805 ± 1.131 0.188 ± 0.100 -1.024 0.136 -4.521 0.210 - - -
EUR 1006 3001 36 42 4.272 ± 1.036 0.164 ± 0.089 -0.808 0.227 -3.360 0.291 - - -
SAS 978 3001 64 56 6.298 ± 1.399 0.213 ± 0.112 -1.030 0.157 -17.287 0.017 - - -
Coding region
AFR 1008 954 33 31 4.138 ± 1.012 0.093 ± 0.072 -1.964 0.000 -27.698 0.000 316 -1,426; p = 1,000 1,453; p = 0,074
EAS 1008 954 26 20 2.669 ± 0.741 0.150 ± 0.102 -1.078 0.128 -13.226 0.006 317 -0,142; p = 1,000 0,141; p = 0,444
EUR 1006 954 22 22 2.937 ± 0.792 0.103 ± 0.077 -1.578 0.021 -13.894 0.001 317 0,444; p = 0,329 -0,439; p = 1,000
SAS 978 954 24 23 3.082 ± 0.821 0.062 ± 0.055 -1.939 0.001 -26.733 0.000 317 -1,034; p = 1,000 1,055; p = 0,147
a

2n: number of chromosomes analyzed

b

Number of different haplotypes

c

Number of segregating sites

d

Average nucleotide diversity and its standard deviation

e

A p-value was computed by the comparison of the estimated statistic to a distribution of estimates computed for 99,999 random samples of the same sample size and level of polymorphism as the observed data, and represents the proportion of the simulated D statistics less or equal to the observed value.

f

A p-value was computed by the comparison of the estimated statistic to a distribution of estimates computed for 99,999 random samples of the same sample size and level of polymorphism as the observed data, and represents the proportion of the simulated F S statistics less or equal to the observed value. The 2% percentile of the distribution corresponded to the 5% cutoff value. Therefore, a F S statistic should be considered as significant at the 5% level, if its p-value is below 0.02, and not below 0.05.