Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Health Econ. 2015 Jan 9;25(2):225–236. doi: 10.1002/hec.3136

Table I.

Baseline and follow-up means for antenatal care and skilled attendance outcomes by Child Grant Program treatment status

Baseline All Control Treatment Difference
Received antenatal care from doctor or nurse 0.73 (0.01) 0.74 (0.02) 0.71 (0.02) −0.04 (0.03)
At least four antenatal care visits 0.63 (0.01) 0.64 (0.02) 0.63 (0.02) −0.02 (0.03)
Quality of antenatal care 0.77 (0.01) 0.76 (0.02) 0.79 (0.02) 0.02 (0.02)
Birth attended by doctor or nurse 0.36 (0.01) 0.41 (0.02) 0.31 (0.02) −0.10 (0.03)**
N 1,155 580 575

Follow-up All Control Treatment Difference

Received antenatal care from doctor or nurse 0.72 (0.02) 0.73 (0.03) 0.72 (0.03) −0.02 (0.04)
At least four antenatal care visits 0.64 (0.02) 0.69 (0.03) 0.59 (0.03) −0.11 (0.04)*
Quality of antenatal care 0.91 (0.01) 0.89 (0.02) 0.92 (0.02) 0.01 (0.03)
Birth attended by doctor or nurse 0.38 (0.02) 0.39 (0.03) 0.36 (0.03) −0.03 (0.04)
N 559 288 271

Notes: Standard errors in parenthesis.

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01.

Sample includes all births in households taking place 15 months prior to baseline and follow-up surveys. Quality of antenatal care is an indicator of having received Voluntary Counseling and Testing for HIV, tetanus vaccination and malaria prevention during antenatal care.