Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 May 22;41(6):1191–1200. doi: 10.1111/acer.13395

Table 2.

Summary of Single Mediators Analyses Predicting Alcohol-Related Problems

N a b c’ (SE) 95% confidence interval
Depression

 Intensity 383 .02 2.21*** .05 (.04) [−.0124, .1658]
 Elasticity 382 .01 −2.63 −.02 (.03) [−.1235, .0168]
 DD (k) 389 .01 .23 .001 (.02) [−.0204, .0470]
 CFC 391 −.90*** −.14** .12 (.06) [ .0322, .2738]
 Craving 391 .74*** .47*** .35 (.10) [.1816, .5776]

Stress

 Intensity 383 .04* 1.95** .07 (.04) [.0123, .1980]
 Elasticity 382 .01 −2.48* −.01 (.03) [−.0865, .0298]
 DD (k) 389 .04 .03 .001 (.02) [−.0317, .0466]
 CFC 391 −.68*** −.15** .10 (.05) [.0248, .2316]
 Craving 391 .81*** .43*** .35 (.10) [.1874, .5822]

Note. CFC = Consideration of Future Consequences; DD (k) = Delay Discounting magnitude; a = pathway from Independent Variable to Mediator; b = pathway from Mediator to Dependent Variable; c’ = indirect effect of the Independent Variable on the Dependent Variable through the Mediator.

***

p< .001,

**

p< .01,

*

p< .05,

bold text indicates significant indirect effect.

Variable Transformed.