Table 4.

Linear regression of log PAT or log PAT/SAT ratio on GIR

Model		Log PAT		Log PAT/SAT
	Males (N=36)	Females (N=47)	p for log	(N=83)	p for log
	β (±SE)*, p-value	β (±SE)*, p-value	PAT* sex	β (±SE)*, p-value	PAT/SAT* sex
Model 1†	−2.62 (±1.27), 0.051	0.05 (±1.05), 0.962	0.218	−1.03 (±0.68), 0.136	0.782
Model 2‡	−1.03 (±1.46), 0.485	−0.49 (±1.30), 0.707	0.201	−1.35 (±0.70), 0.057	0.835
Model 3§	−1.33 (±1.78), 0.462	1.48 (±1.46), 0.320	0.111	−0.96 (±0.74), 0.200	0.807
Model 4||	−0.18 (±2.38), 0.940	3.36 (±1.96), 0.097	0.055	−2.08 (±1.03), 0.047	0.768

Abbreviations: PAT, pericardial adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; GIR, glucose infusion rate; BMI, body mass index; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; LDL, low-density lipoprotein

^*Per 1 SD

^†Adjusted for diabetes, race, age, systolic blood pressure, LDL, log triglycerides, on blood pressure and lipid lowering medication, percent of energy from fats and carbohydrates, and square-root transformed minutes of moderate intensity-equivalent activity weekly; additionally adjusted for sex in log PAT/SAT ratio models

^‡Adjusted for variables in Model 1 + BMI

^§Adjusted for variables in Model 2 + VAT

^||Adjusted for variables in Model 3 + log PAT/SAT ratio or log PAT, respectively