Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;8:1076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01076

Table 3.

Bootstrap analysis summary showing the indirect effects of the Big Five personality traits on life satisfaction via coping style (N = 2,357).

Independent variables (IV) Mediator variable (MV) Dependent variables (DV) a Path coefficient (IV-MV) b Path coefficient (MV-DV) Indirect effects and 95%CI [lower, upper] c’ Path coefficient (direct effect)
E PC LS 0.04** 0.25*** 0.01 [0.004,0.02] 0.31***
E NC LS 0.24*** -0.03* –0.01 [–0.03, –0.001]
A PC LS 0.14** 0.25*** 0.04 [0.03,0.06] 0.08**
A NC LS 0.09 -0.03* –0.003 [–0.004,0.002]
O PC LS 0.17*** 0.25*** 0.04 [0.02,0.13] -0.05
O NC LS 0.03* -0.03* –0.001 [–0.03, –0.001]
C PC LS 0.42*** 0.25*** 0.11 [0.08,0.13] 0.21***
C NC LS -0.25*** -0.03* 0.01 [0.003,0.02]
N PC LS -0.11*** 0.25*** –0.03 [–0.05, –0.02] -0.26***
N NC LS 0.62*** -0.03* –0.02 [–0.04, –0.01]

p< 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; aaap < 0.001. E = Extraversion, A = Agreeableness, O = Openness to New Experience, C = Conscientiousness, N = Neuroticism, PC = Positive Coping, NC = Negative Coping, LS = Life Satisfaction. These values are based on standardized path coefficients. Controlling for the effect of gender and age on all the observed variables.