Table 5.
Participation at second invitation for all national IMD quintiles (from most to least deprived)
| Intervention group | Control group | Absolute difference in attendance | RR (95% CI) | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMD quintile 1 (most deprived) | ||||||
| Number invited | 3395 | 3623 | .. | .. | .. | |
| Participation in screening | ||||||
| Within 90 days of first offered appointment | 639 (19%) | 353 (10%) | 9% | 1·93 (1·69–2·20) | <0·0001 | |
| Within 180 days of episode opened | 682 (20%) | 386 (11%) | 9% | 1·89 (1·66–2·14) | <0·0001 | |
| IMD quintile 2 | ||||||
| Number invited | 3645 | 3703 | .. | .. | .. | |
| Participation in screening | ||||||
| Within 90 days of first offered appointment | 768 (21%) | 398 (11%) | 10% | 1·96 (1·73–2·22) | <0·0001 | |
| Within 180 days of episode opened | 825 (23%) | 434 (12%) | 11% | 1·93 (1·71–2·17) | <0·0001 | |
| IMD quintile 3 | ||||||
| Number invited | 2864 | 2978 | .. | .. | .. | |
| Participation in screening | ||||||
| Within 90 days of first offered appointment | 686 (24%) | 402 (13%) | 10% | 1·77 (1·56–2·01) | <0·0001 | |
| Within 180 days of episode opened | 734 (26%) | 442 (15%) | 11% | 1·73 (1·53–1·95) | <0·0001 | |
| IMD quintile 4 | ||||||
| Number invited | 1946 | 2028 | .. | .. | .. | |
| Participation in screening | ||||||
| Within 90 days of first offered appointment | 488 (25%) | 297 (15%) | 10% | 1·71 (1·48–1·98) | <0·0001 | |
| Within 180 days of episode opened | 519 (27%) | 324 (16%) | 11% | 1·67 (1·45–1·92) | <0·0001 | |
| IMD quintile 5 (least deprived) | ||||||
| Number invited | 939 | 891 | .. | .. | .. | |
| Participation in screening | ||||||
| Within 90 days of first offered appointment | 277 (29%) | 178 (20%) | 10% | 1·48 (1·22–1·79) | <0·0001 | |
| Within 180 days of episode opened | 290 (31%) | 194 (22%) | 9% | 1·42 (1·18–1·71) | <0·0001 | |
Data are number who participated (%) unless otherwise stated. IMD=2010 Index of Multiple Deprivation. RR=relative risk. Percentages fhave been rounded up.