Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul;18(7):958–971. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30243-7

Table 2.

Identification of prognostic survival markers in MBSHH-Child cohort

n Univariate (n=55)
Cross-validated multivariate (n=42)
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
MYCN amplification vs no amplification 52 4·47 (1·65–12·1) 0·0032 2·83 (0·87–9·22) 0·084
M+ vs M– disease 55 5·69 (2·01–16·0) 0·0011 4·59 (1·28–16·4) 0·019
TP53 mutation vs no mutation 48 3·47 (1·29–9·30) 0·014 3·44 (1·15–10·2) 0·027
LCA pathology vs non-LCA pathology 52 2·88 (1·15–7·24) 0·025 .. ..
TERT wild-type vs TERT mutation 52 2·21 (0·78–6·25) 0·13 .. ..
R+ vs R– disease 55 3·45 (1·30–9·19) 0·013 .. ..
Male vs female 55 1·13 (0·45–2·82) 0·79 .. ..

p values are from Cox proportional hazards analyses. The prognostic significance of covariates selected in cross-validated multivariate models are also shown. HR=hazard ratio. M+=metastatic disease. M–=non-metastatic disease. LCA=large-cell anaplastic. R+=residual disease (subtotal surgical resection). R–=no residual disease (gross total resection).