Table 1.
variable | men (n = 154) | women (n = 262) |
---|---|---|
right hand | ||
2nd finger length, mm | 73.82 ± 4.19 (61.00 to 87.00) |
67.77 ± 4.60 (42.80 to 79.00) |
4th finger length, mm | 75.27 ± 4.61 (64.00 to 89.00) |
68.31 ± 4.76 (39.80 to 79.90) |
2D : 4D ratio | 0.982 ± 0.037 | 0.993 ± 0.037 |
2D : 4D normalized indexa | 0.993 ± 0.034 | 0.986 ± 0.035 |
2D : 4D normalized indexb | 0.994 ± 0.033 | 0.986 ± 0.035 |
2D : 4D normalized indexc | 2.328 ± 0.079 | 2.310 ± 0.081 |
adjusted 2nd finger length, mma | 70.37 ± 2.40 | 69.79 ± 2.46 |
adjusted 2nd finger length, mmb | 70.34 ± 2.51 | 69.82 ± 2.38 |
left hand | ||
2nd finger length, mm | 74.13 ± 4.10 (61.00 to 90.00) |
67.46 ± 4.36 (44.20 to 78.00) |
4th finger length, mm | 75.42 ± 4.73 (62.90 to 91.00) |
68.08 ± 4.79 (38.80 to 80.00) |
2D : 4D ratio | 0.984 ± 0.036 | 0.992 ± 0.037 |
2D : 4D normalized indexa | 1.000 ± 0.032 | 0.983 ± 0.033 |
2D : 4D normalized indexb | 0.996 ± 0.032 | 0.985 ± 0.034 |
2D : 4D normalized indexc | 2.775 ± 0.090 | 2.730 ± 0.091 |
adjusted 2nd finger length, mma | 70.67 ± 2.28 | 69.49 ± 2.32 |
adjusted 2nd finger length, mmb | 70.64 ± 2.36 | 69.51 ± 2.24 |
aTwo-parameter power function with normal, homoscedastic error.
bStraight line with intercept and normal, homoscedastic error.
cPower function ratio. The normalized indices (footnotes a and b) were derived directly from the model residuals [12] in raw arithmetic space, with the 2D : 4D ratio or 2D as the dependent variable and 4D and sex as predictors. Each participant's residual was added to the predicted mean ratio for each sex at the mean 4D length in the whole sample, to obtain an adjusted 2D : 4D ‘ratio’ or 2D free from the influence of 4D length. The normalized index (footnote c) was directly derived from the ratio of 2D to 4D raised to the power of 0.80 and 0.76 in the right and left hand, respectively.