Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2017 Mar 23;72:41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.014

Table 2.

Negative Binomial Regression Models Predicting Drinking Outcomes

Predictors Typical Alcohol Consumptiona
Hazardous Drinkingb
Exp (b) SE b p Exp (b) SE b p
Drinking Identity IAT Model
 Sex 0.56 0.36 .101 0.60 0.21 .017
 Drinking Identity IAT 3.46 0.50 .014 2.06 0.24 .002
 Explicit Drinking Identityc 1.23 0.13 .123 1.28 0.07 .001
Alcohol Identity IAT Model
 Sex 0.44 0.29 .004 0.53 0.19 .001
 Alcohol Identity IAT 3.00 0.53 .037 1.78 0.30 .056
 Explicit Drinking Identity 1.29 0.12 .043 1.31 0.07 <.001
Combined IAT Model
 Sex 0.48 0.34 .032 0.53 0.21 .003
 Drinking Identity IAT 3.23 0.49 .018 2.28 0.28 .003
 Alcohol Identity IAT 2.39 0.62 .158 1.63 0.34 .153

Note. Exp (b) represents exponentiated coefficients. Sex was dummy-coded (0 = men, 1 = women); IAT = Implicit Association Test; higher scores on IATs indicate stronger drinking and alcohol identities;

a

number of standard drinks derived from the Daily Drinking Questionnaire;

b

summary score derived from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test;

c

derived from the Alcohol Self-Concept Scale; higher scores indicate greater identification with drinking alcohol.