Table 2.
Results of the sensitivity analysis to compare adherence scores using the Mediterranean Diet Score [22].
| Adherence Score | Adherence Scores | p for Interaction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 2 Months | 4 Months | |||||
| MedDiet | HabDiet | MedDiet | HabDiet | MedDiet | HabDiet | ||
| 15-point score | 7.1 ± 1.9 | 7.4 ± 2.4 | 9.7 ± 2.4 | 7.7 ± 2.2 | 10.6 ± 1.7 | 7.9 ± 2.5 | <0.001 |
| 10-point MDS 1 | 4.2 ± 1.7 | 4.2 ± 1.6 | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 4.1 ± 1.7 | 6.2 ± 1.4 | 4.4 ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
| 10-point MDS 2 | 2.8 ± 1.4 | 2.8 ± 1.5 | 3.7 ± 2.1 | 2.6 ± 1.5 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 3.0 ± 1.3 | <0.001 |
Values presented are mean ± SD. p for dietxvisit interaction derived from linear mixed effects models to compare MedDiet and HabDiet groups across time. 1 Using baseline sex-specific medians. 2 Using baseline sex-specific medians from the Greek cohort in the EPIC study, from Trichopoulou et al. [22] MDS, Mediterranean Diet Score; MedDiet, Mediterranean diet; HabDiet, Habitual diet.