Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):e64–e70. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10333

Table 1.

Background characteristics of original CTN sample, NESARC treatment seeking substance users and reweighted CTN sample

Original CTN Sample NESARC Treatment Seeking Substance Users Original CTN sample versus NESARC Treatment Seeking Substance Users (p-value)a CTN Reweighted to approximate NESARC Treatment Seeking Substance Usersb Original CTN sample versus CTN sample reweighted to approximate NESARC Treatment Seeking Substance Users

N=507 N=183 N= 507 (p-value)a

Mean SD Mean SD Weighted Mean Weighted SD

Age (years) 34.90 10.90 35.52 11.75 0.52 36.25 10.47 0.46

N % N % Weighted N Weighted %

Female (%) 192 37.90 75 39.29 0.75 172.00 34.14 0.21
Race (%) <0.0001 0.80
White 284 56.00 133 73.65 372.59 74.07
Black/African American 116 22.90 33 14.52 79.61 15.83
American Indian/Alaska Native 3 0.60 5 4.54 11.49 2.28
Asian 13 2.60 1 0.76 3.19 0.63
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 12 2.40 2 1.64 12.92 2.57
Multi-racial 54 10.70 9 4.89 23.20 4.61
Other 23 4.50
Hispanic/Latino (%) 55 10.80 34 14.10 0.24 43.08 8.56 0.03
Education (%) <0.0001 0.77
< High School Degree 118 23.30 42 24.17 109.48 21.76
High School Degree/GED 310 61.10 59 30.44 152.72 30.36
> High School Degree 79 15.60 82 45.39 240.81 47.87
Marital Status (%) <0.0001 0.77
Single/Never Married 308 60.70 75 37.79 176.21 35.03
Married/Remarried 72 14.20 53 36.12 184.49 36.68
Separated/Divorced/Widowed 127 25.00 55 26.09 142.30 28.29
Underemployed (%) 190 37.50 80 43.22 0.17 226.82 45.09 0.66
Substance Dependence (%)
Alcohol 224 44.20 85 46.10 0.66 274.29 54.53 0.05
Cocaine 177 34.90 19 10.10 <0.0001 56.49 11.23 0.67
Stimulants 100 19.70 12 7.04 <0.0001 39.82 7.92 0.70
Cannabis 146 28.80 23 12.50 <0.0001 60.67 12.06 0.88
Opiates 158 31.20 19 10.46 <0.0001 54.81 10.90 0.87
Other 41 8.10 23 12.28 0.09 57.90 11.51 0.78
a

Based on chi-square and t-tests as appropriate.

b

Weighting was done using propensity score weighting (see text for details).