Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2017 Apr 17;14(6):629–635. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4264

Table 1. Comparison of CREST-seq to published CRISPR/Cas9 screens of non-codin gregulatory sequences.

CREST-seq is compared to the published screening of non-coding regulatory elements. The following aspects are compared: the size of screen region; the total number of oligos required to construct the library; the average number of oligos per kilobase in each screen; and the estimated coverage of the target region. To estimate the coverage of target region, we assume that the PAM motifs are equally distributed across the genome and each gRNA creates a mean indel size 9.5bp ± 13.7bp. To compute the coverage of CRISPRi screen using dCas9-KRAB, we assume that the average size of H3K9me3 peaks introduced by dCas9-KRAB is about 850bp.

Reference Target region Total oligo # Oligo density (per KB) Coverage Distinguish Trans or Cis?
Canver et al, 2015 10 4.2kb, 3 DHS and 1 exon 582 137 ~1x No
Korkmaz et al, 2016 11 685 p53 ChIP-seq peaks 1116 NA 1.3-1.6 oligos per ChIP-seq peak No
73 eRNA expressing ERa ChIP-seq peaks 97 NA
2kb, deCDKN1A locus 197 98.5 <93.6%
Rajagopal et al, 2016 12 40kb Tdgf1 locus 3908 98 <93.1% No
Rpp25, Nanog, and Zfp42 loci 3908 NA NA
Diao et al, 2016, 13 37.6kb, 174 putative enhancers in 1Mbp POU5F1 locus 1964 52 <49.4% No
Sanjana et al, 2016 14 200kb NF1 locus 6682 33.4 <31.7% No
200kb NF2 locus 6934 34.6 <32.9%
200kb CUL3 locus 4699 23.5 <22.3%
Fulco et al, 2016 15 1.29Mbp, GATA1 and MYC loci 98,000 76 ~64x No
CREST-seq 2Mbp, POU5F1 locus 11,600 5.7 20x Yes