Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179530

Fig 4. Evaluation of DET using simulations.

Fig 4

  • A) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the absence of batch effects with 6 observations and 265 metabolites.
  • B) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the presence of batch effects with 12 observations and 265 metabolites.
  • C) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the absence of batch effects with 50 observations and 265 metabolites.
  • D) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the presence of batch effects with 100 observations and 265 metabolites.
  • E) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the absence of batch effects with 100 observations and 265 metabolites.
  • F) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the presence of batch effects with 200 observations and 265 metabolites.
  • G) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the absence of batch effects with 100 observations and 500 metabolites.
  • H) Detection-error tradeoff (DET) plots comparing the performance of the 9 methods in the presence of batch effects with 200 observations and 500 metabolites.