Abstract
A novel Suzuki-Miyaura protocol is described that enables the exhaustive alkylation of polychlorinated pyridines. This method enables a formal synthesis of normuscopyridine and the rapid assembly of a dumbbell shaped portion of a [2]rotaxane.
The 2-alkylpyridine scaffold is critical to bioactive small molecules, to molecular machines, and within ligands for metal catalyzed transformations (Figure 1).1 Several powerful approaches have been developed to install alkyl substituents on pre-formed pyridyl cores.2 In terms of traditional cross-coupling approaches, 2-pyridyl organometallic reagents have been advanced, but suffer from air instability3 and reaction-specific limitations, including requirements for high catalyst loadings or a narrow range of cross-coupling partners.4 A complementary approach involves the direct functionalization of affordable, readily accessible, and chemically stable heteroaryl chlorides by way of a cross-coupling reaction.5 The Suzuki–Miyaura reaction relies on commercially available reagents that offer reduced toxicity.6,7 Only a few conditions can couple alkyl organoboron reagents with 2-halopyridines.8 To complement our disclosed selective and serial Suzuki-Miyaura reactions of polychlorinated pyridines with alkyl pinacol boronic esters (Scheme 1, eq 1, 2),9 we now describe an exhaustive Suzuki-Miyaura reaction of haloarenes, including 2-pyridylchlorides (Scheme 1, eq 3).
Figure 1.

Scheme 1.

Prior disclosures and these investigations
The challenges in this transformation derive from (1) the ability of the Lewis basic pyridine nitrogen to bind the metal and inhibit further reactivity,10 and (2) the relatively slow transmetallation of alkyl organoboron species. Slow transmetallation renders decomposition pathways more competitive, including protodehalogenation of aryl halides, protodeborylation11 of the alkyl boronic esters, and β-hydride elimination processes of palladium-alkyl intermediates.
Initially, we chose to interrogate the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction of 2,6-dichloropyridine (3a) with heptyl pinacol boronic ester to generate 2,6-dialkylpyridine 5a (Table 1). The targeted bond-forming reactions do not proceed efficiently using many cutting-edge protocols to couple aryl halides with alkyl boron compounds.12 We anticipated that this reaction would be promoted by sterically encumbered alkyl phosphine ligands. Such ligands favor formation of mono-coordinated palladium-phosphine complexes, which undergo accelerated oxidative addition,13 transmetallation, and reductive elimination processes.14 Moreover, sterically encumbered ligands can help to mitigate β-hydride elimination following transmetallation of the organoboron species. We found that di(1-adamantyl)-n-butylphosphine provided the highest levels of dialkylpyridine 5a (entries 1–3).
Table 1.
Influence of base, ligand, and palladium source on reaction outcome
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| entry | Pd source | X | equiv 6a | solvent | base | 4a (%)a | 5a (%)a |
| 1 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | ndb | 94c |
| 2d | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | 25% | 5% |
| 3e | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | 52% | 6% |
| 4 | Pd2(dba)3 | Cl | 2.3 | PhMe | K3PO4 | 5 | ndb |
| 5 | Pd2(dba)3 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | 5 | 90 |
| 6 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane | LiOtBu | <5 | ndb |
| 7 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | PhMe/H2O | LiOtBu | 40 | <5 |
| 8 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | PhMe | LiOtBu | <5 | ndb |
| 9 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | CsF | 29 | <5 |
| 10 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane | CsF | 5 | ndb |
| 11 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | Cs2CO3 | 72 | 7 |
| 12 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | K3PO4 | 73 | 13 |
| 13 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | NaOtBu | 68 | 8 |
| 14 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | KOtBu | 39 | 31 |
| 15 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | LiOMe | 33 | 66 |
| 16 | Pd(OAc)2 | Cl | 1.0 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | 56 | 20 |
| 17 | Pd(OAc)2 | Br | 1.0 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | ndb | 48 |
| 18 | Pd(OAc)2 | Br | 2.3 | dioxane/H2O | LiOtBu | ndb | 94 |
Determined by 1H NMR.
nd = Not detected.
Isolated yield.
FcPPh2 used in place of Ad2PnBu.
Tricyclohexylphosphine used in place of Ad2PnBu.
The optimal conditions vary slightly from those disclosed recently to affect the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction of halopyridines with boronic acids (entry 4),15 but the differences have a dramatic impact on the reaction. Empirical studies with different palladium sources and solvents revealed a beneficial effect derived from the use of a Pd(OAc)2 pre-catalyst and solvation with 4:1 dioxane:water (entries 4–8). Presumably, water mediates pinacol boronic ester speciation.
Pinacol boronic ester speciation also depends on reaction pH. Reaction conversion increases with increasing basicity (entries 9–12; pKa of corresponding conjugate acids in water: HF, 3.2; HCO3−, 10.2; HPO42−, 12.7; HOtBu, 16.5).16 Interestingly, the identity of the counter cation resulted in significant differences in conversion to the exhaustively coupled product, presumably due to differences in nucleophilicity (entries 13–14).17 Lithium alkoxides were the only bases screened that favoured exhaustive coupling over selective coupling (entries 1, 15). Under the optimal conditions, the reaction of 2,6-dichloropyridine with heptyl boronic pinacol ester (2.3 equiv) proceeded in a 4:1 mixture of dioxane:H2O at 100 °C with LiOtBu, 1 mol% Pd(OAc)2 and 3 mol% Ad2PnBu to afford 2,6-diheptylpyridine (5a) in excellent selectivity and 94% isolated yield (entry 1). In general, LiOtBu is not included as a base during empirical screens of Suzuki-Miyaura reaction conditions.12,18 These results suggest that it could be of broad relevance to base-tolerant substrates.
With 2,6-dichloropyridine, exhaustively coupled product 5a is predominately formed only with an excess of boronic ester 6a. Conversely, when 6a is employed as the limiting reagent, selectively coupled 4a is the major product (entry 16). By contrast, 2,6-dibromopyridine generates nearly exclusively exhaustively coupled 5a when 6a is used as the limiting substrate (entry 17). We hypothesize that during the transformation, the palladium catalyst remains ligated to the 2-bromo-6-alkylpyridine intermediate, but can dissociate from 2-chloro-6-alkylpyridine species prior to the second transmetallation event. This differential reactivity could be a consequence of the higher barrier to oxidative addition to aryl chlorides relative to bromides.
Under the optimized conditions, 2,6-dibromo- and 2,6-dichloropyridine react with similar efficiency (entries 1, 18). Consequently, we have chosen to investigate the reaction scope with chloroaromatic electrophiles, which are thought to be more challenging cross-coupling partners, and are often more readily available and less expensive. An array of aryl chlorides couple smoothly with pinacol boronic ester 6b (Table 2). Mono-, di-, and trichloropyridines are converted to mono-, di-, and trialkylpyridines, respectively (entries 1–3). This protocol tolerates electron-donating substituents on pyridine, which were not effectively transformed under our previously reported selective conditions (entry 4–5),9 as well as electron-deficient aryl chlorides (entry 6). This protocol affects reaction of other 2-chloroheteroaryl compounds, such as isoquinolines (entry 7). In most cases, the starting aryl chloride and the reported product account for the mass balance of the reaction. An exception is 2,6-dichloro-4-trifluoromethyl pyridine, which is known to be unstable at elevated temperatures (entry 8).
Table 2.
A general procedure for Suzuki-Miyaura reactions of aryl chlorides
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| entrya | ArCl | product | yield (%)b | ||
| 1c |
|
|
5b, 81 | ||
| 2 |
|
|
5c, 95 | ||
| 3d |
|
|
5d, 82 | ||
| 4c,e |
|
|
5e, 98 | ||
| 5e,f 6e,f |
|
NO2 |
|
5f, 90 5g, 90 |
|
| 7g |
|
|
5h, 84 | ||
| 8 9 |
|
Me |
|
5i, 52 5j, 96 |
|
| 10c,d |
|
|
5k, 18 | ||
| 11e,h |
|
|
5l, 99 | ||
General reaction conditions: 1.0 equiv aryl chloride, 0.105 M dioxane/H2O (4:1), 2.3 equiv R2Bpin, 1 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 3 mol % Ad2PnBu, 6.0 equiv LiOtBu, 24 h, 100 °C.
Isolated yield.
2 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 6 mol % AdPnBu.
3.5 equiv R2Bpin, 9.0 equiv LiOtBu.
1.5 equiv R2Bpin, 3.0 equiv LiOtBu.
20 h.
16 h.
Isolated after reaction with trifluoroacetic acid.
These conditions do not productively transform more acidic substrates, such as 6-chloroindole and 6-chloropyridin-2-one, both of which would be expected to be deprotonated under the reaction conditions. Even p-chloroacetophenone does not undergo efficient cross-coupling, possibly due to competitive deprotonation (Table 2, entry 10). Relative to HOtBu, p-chloroacetophenone is more acidic in DMSO (pKa 23.78 vs 32.2), and slightly more basic in water (pKa 18.1 vs. 16.5.16b, 19 Many base-originated limitations can be surmounted through use of a weaker base or by substrate design. For example, substrate redesign permits access to 6-alkylpyridin-2-ones from 2-alkoxy-6-chloropyridines (entry 11). Therefore, this protocol may be used as a launching point for optimization of Suzuki-Miyaura reactions of 2-halopyridines with alkyl boronic esters displaying increased base sensitivity.
Pyridyl chlorides react effectively with alkyl pinacol boronic esters that incorporate distal unsaturation, acetals, or ethers (Table 3, entries 1–8). The clean formation of unsaturated products is notable, as similar selectivity would be difficult to achieve via Heck olefination reactions or Suzuki-Miyaura reactions involving transmetallation of in situ-generated organoboranes. Additionally, these unsaturated compounds can be valuable intermediates: the reaction of 2,6-dichloropyridine to form 2,6-dihexenylpyridine constitutes a formal synthesis of the fragrance molecule normuscopyridine, which can be accessed upon ring-closing metathesis and reduction (entry 2).20 As might be expected, these conditions can also be applied to access biaryl compounds (entry 8).
Table 3.
Functional group tolerance in disclosed Suzuki-Miyaura reactions
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| entrya | R1 | organoboron | product | yield (%)b | |
| 1 2 |
CI CI |
|
5 |
|
5m, 90 5n, 85 |
| 3c 4d |
CI CI |
|
H Et |
|
5o, 44 5p, 45 |
| 5c,e,f 6d,e,f |
tBuO tBuO |
|
H Et |
|
5q, 85 5r, 84 |
| 7f | tBuO |
|
|
5s, 90 | |
| 8g | tBuO |
|
|
5t, 99 | |
| 9f 10g |
tBuO tBuO |
|
TBS |
|
5u, 84 5v, 89 |
| 11e,i | tBuO |
|
|
5w, 47 | |
General reaction conditions: 1.0 equiv aryl chloride, 0.105 M dioxane/H2O (4:1), 2.3 equiv R2Bpin, 1 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 3 mol % Ad2PnBu, 6.0 equiv LiOtBu, 24 h, 100 °C.
Isolated yield.
Pinacol boronic ester and product have isomeric ratios of >19:1 E:Z.
Pinacol boronic ester and product have isomeric ratios of >19:1 Z:E.
Isolated after reaction with trifluoroacetic acid.
1.5 equiv R2Bpin, 3.0 equiv LiOtBu.
1.5 equiv RrBpin, 3.0 equiv K3PO4, no LiOtBu.
1.5 equiv PhB(OH)2, no R2Bpin, 3.0 equiv LiOtBu, 18 h.
4.0 equiv CsF, no LiOtBu.
One feature of this exhaustive protocol is that base-sensitive substrates may undergo multiple base-mediated transformations in a single operation. Notably, application of the standard conditions to cross-couple a silyl ether with an activated 2-pyridyl chloride proceeds with desilylation to furnish alcohol 5s (entry 9). As an alternative, the base labile silyl ether coupling partner is amenable to slightly modified conditions to deliver the intact silylated product (entry 10).
To push the limits of this protocol, we focused on allyl pinacol boronic ester, which is known to be highly reactive and easily protodeborylated (entry 11). While our optimized reaction protocol involving LiOtBu does not generate the desired product; anhydrous conditions can be applied with a more organic soluble base to promote productive cross-coupling. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first example of direct Suzuki-Miyaura catalyzed allylation of an aryl chloride, previous reports being limited to the use of more reactive aryl iodides and bromides.
The utility of the disclosed reaction has been demonstrated in the synthesis of a dumbbell shaped molecule for a rotaxane (i.e., 1). Pyridine 1 has been previously accessed in a longest linear sequence of five steps, or in three steps and 54% yield from common intermediate 9 via palladium-catalyzed Sonagashira cross-coupling and hydrogenation reactions.1d This new protocol furnishes 1 in in two steps and 64% yield from common intermediate 9. This protocol could assist in the development of new molecular machines, as, in principle, the alkyl boronic ester substrate can be easily modified to access threads of varying length or to generate differentially substituted dumbbell shaped molecules if deployed in sequence with the previously disclosed selective method.9
In conclusion, these optimized Suzuki-Miyaura reaction conditions enable the controlled alkylation of series of 2,6-dichloropyridines in presence of unsaturation, etherial linkages, or acetals. The use of bulky Ad2PnBu in combination with LiOtBu facilitates oxidative addition onto 2-chloro-6-alkylpyridines, thereby forming exhaustively alkylated products. Importantly, these reaction conditions minimize β-hydride elimination processes as well as protodehalogenation of the starting materials. These conditions have been applied to gain efficient access to a known [2]rotaxane component.
This project was funded by the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund Doctoral New Investigator Program (PRF# 54824-DNI1) and by Duke University. J.M.B. was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007105-41). Characterization data were obtained on instrumentation secured by funding from the NSF (CHE-0923097, ESI-MS, George Dubay, the Duke Dept. of Chemistry Instrument Center), or the NSF, the NIH, HHMI, the North Carolina Biotechnology Center and Duke (Duke Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Center). Jacob Timmerman and Prof. R. Widenhoefer of Duke University are thanked for their insights. Ekaterina Khlystova and Brendan Sweeney are thanked for their contributions to initial investigations.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 2.

Application to the synthesis of a dumbbell shaped molecule for a rotaxane
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Full experimental details, copies of NMR spectra (PDF).
Notes and references
- 1.(a) Schinz H, Ruzicka L, Geyer U, Prelog V. Helv Chim Acta. 1946;29:1524. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fürstner A, Leitner A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:308. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Davis JM, Truong A, Hamilton AD. Org Lett. 2005;7:5405. doi: 10.1021/ol0521228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Goldup SM, Leigh DA, Lusby PJ, McBurney RT, Slawin AMZ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:6999. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhang YH, Shi BF, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:5072. doi: 10.1021/ja900327e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Goetz AE, Garg NK. Nature Chemistry. 2013;5:54. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.For select C–H activation processes, see:; (a) Lewis JC, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5332. doi: 10.1021/ja070388z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nakao Y, Yamada Y, Kashihara N, Hiyama T. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13666. doi: 10.1021/ja106514b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For select examples that involve distinct bond-forming and deprotonation steps, see:; (c) Jeffrey JL, Sarpong R. Org Lett. 2012;14:5400. doi: 10.1021/ol3024117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chen Q, León T, Knochel P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:8746. doi: 10.1002/anie.201400750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Hyodo I, Tobisu M, Chatani N. Chem Asian J. 2012;7:1357. doi: 10.1002/asia.201100971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For select Minisci type-pathways, see:; (f) Jin J, MacMillan DWC. Nature. 2015;525:87. doi: 10.1038/nature14885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Gianatassio R, Kawamura S, Eprile CL, Foo K, Ge J, Burns AC, Collins MR, Baran PS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:9851. doi: 10.1002/anie.201406622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) O’Hara F, Blackmond DG, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:12122. doi: 10.1021/ja406223k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.For select 2-pyridyl zinc reagents, see:; (a) Cornella J, Edwards JT, Qin T, Kawamura S, Wang J, Pan CM, Gianatassio R, Schmidt M, Eastgate MD, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:2174. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b00250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Colombe JR, Bernhardt S, Stathakis C, Buchwald SL, Knochel P. Org Lett. 2013;15:5754. doi: 10.1021/ol402798z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Luzung MR, Patel JS, Yin J. J Org Chem. 2010;75:8330. doi: 10.1021/jo1018798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For select 2-pyridyl boron reagents, see:; (d) Dick GR, Woerly EM, Burke MD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:2667. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Sakashita S, Takisawa M, Sugai J, Ito H, Yamamoto Y. Org Lett. 2013;15:4308. doi: 10.1021/ol402268g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Billingsley KL, Buchwald SL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4695. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For 2-pyridyl tin reagents, see:; (g) Littke AF, Schawarz L, Fu GC. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:6343. doi: 10.1021/ja020012f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Bailey TR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:4407. [Google Scholar]; For 2-pyridyl aluminum reagents, see:; (i) Chen X, Zhou L, Li Y, Xie T, Zhou S. J Org Chem. 2014;79:230. doi: 10.1021/jo4024123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.For a select coupling reaction, see:; Llaveria J, Leonori D, Aggarwal VK. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:10958. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b07842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.For select Negishi and Kumada reactions, see:; (a) Malhotra S, Seng PS, Koenig SG, Deese AJ, Ford KA. Org Lett. 2013;15:3698. doi: 10.1021/ol401508u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fürstner A, Leitner A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:308. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Getmanenko YA, Tweig RJ. J Org Chem. 2008;73:830. doi: 10.1021/jo701812t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For cross-electrophile reactions, see:; (d) Everson DA, Buonomo JA, Weix DJ. Synlett. 2014;25:233. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1340151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tyrrell E, Brookes P. Synthesis. 2003;4:469. [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Han FS. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:5270. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35521g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem Rev. 1995;95:2457. [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Martin R, Buchwald SL. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1461. doi: 10.1021/ar800036s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Billingsley K, Anderson KW, Buchwald SL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:3484. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Li L, Zhao S, Joshi-Pangu A, Diane M, Biscoe MR. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:14027. doi: 10.1021/ja508815w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Jouffroy M, Primer DN, Molander GA. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:475. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Laulhé S, Blackburn JM, Roizen JL. Org Lett. 2016;18:4440. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Itoh T, Mase T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005:3573. [Google Scholar]; (b) Slagt VF, de Vries AHM, de Vries JG, Kellogg RM. Org Process Res Dev. 2009;14:30. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dreher SD, Dormer PG, Sandrock DL, Molander GA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:9257. doi: 10.1021/ja8031423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Yang CT, Zhang ZQ, Tajuddin H, Wu CC, Liang J, Liu JH, Fu Y, Czyzewska M, Steel PG, Marder TB, Liu L. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:528. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Q, Liskey CW, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8755–8765. doi: 10.1021/ja503676d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Fleury-Brégeot N, Presset M, Beaumard F, Colombel V, Oehlrich D, Rombouts F, Molander GA. J Org Chem. 2012;77:10399. doi: 10.1021/jo3021665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Paul F, Pratt J, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:5969. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hartwig JF, Paul F. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:5373. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hartwig JF. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:2046. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980817)37:15<2046::AID-ANIE2046>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Hartwig JF, Richards S, Barañano D, Paul F. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:3626. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hartwig JF. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:1936. doi: 10.1021/ic061926w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reimann S, Ehlers P, Parpart S, Surkus A, Spannenberg A, Langer P. Tetrahedron. 2015;71:5371. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Haynes WM, editor. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 97th. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; Boca Raton, FL: 2017. Internet Version. [Google Scholar]; (b) Reeve W, Erikson CM, Aluotto PF. Can J Chem. 1979;57:2747. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Amatore C, Jutland A, Le Duc G. Chem Eur J. 2012;18:6616. doi: 10.1002/chem.201200516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang CT, Zhang ZQ, Liu YC, Liu L. Chem Commun. 2011;50:3904. doi: 10.1002/anie.201008007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Bordwell FG, Cornforth FJ. J Org Chem. 1978;43:1763. [Google Scholar]; (b) Olmstead WN, Margolin Z, Bordwell FG. J Org Chem. 1980;45:3295. [Google Scholar]; (c) Guthrie PJ, Cossar J, Klym A. Can J Chem. 1987;65:2154. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kotha S, Waghule GT, Shirbhate ME. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:984. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
