Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jul 27;61(16):6105–6120. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/6105

Table 2.

Confusion Matrixes for out of sample classification of the decision trees shown in Figure 4, pessimistic tree built using only 80% of the data, Random Forests classifier and RUSBoost algorithm. For the high-risk population on the tree in Figure 4 A), 15% (4/26) of patients developed pneumonitis. On the other hand, for the high risk population of the tree on Figure a B) 22.73% (5/22) developed pneumonitis. The true performance will be in between these values and the pessimistic estimation. At this stage, the performance of the random forest is equivalent to the decision trees nevertheless, RUSBoost performs better than all the algorithms. True Positive = TP, False Negative = FN, False Positive = FP, True Negative = TN.

Figure 4 A) tree
Pneumonitis 4 TP 4 FN
No pneumonitis 22 FP 171 TN
Figure 4 B) tree
Pneumonitis 5 TP 3 FN
No pneumonitis 17 FP 176 TN
Pessimistic tree
Pneumonitis 2 TP 6 FN
No pneumonitis 45 FP 148 TN
Random Forests
Pneumonitis 5 TP 3 FN
No pneumonitis 16 FP 177 TN
RUSBoost
Pneumonitis 6 TP 2 FN
No pneumonitis 28 FP 165 TN