Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;595(13):4245–4260. doi: 10.1113/JP273928

Table 3.

Right ventricular morphologic parameters (mean ± SEM)

Parameter CTL (n = 16) OLD (n = 12) IUGR (n = 16) ANOVA Post hoc
Absolute values
RV‐ESV (ml) 14.4 ± 1.7 16.4 ± 2.5 23.0 ± 3.1 G** S*** CTL < IUGR**
M > F***
Male 17.4 ± 2.8 23.1 ± 3.2 31.4 ± 4.3
Female 11.4 ± 1.6 10.7 ± 1.5 14.5 ± 1.2
RV‐EDV (ml) 28.0 ± 3.0 31.7 ± 5.5 33.7 ± 3.8 S*** M > F***
Male 33.3 ± 4.7 45.8 ± 7.1 45.6 ± 4.2
Female 22.6 ± 2.8 17.6 ± 1.5 21.7 ± 1.3
RV‐pWT (mm) 4.1 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.4
Male 4.7 ± 0.5 3.7 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.5
Female 3.4 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.6
RV‐LSF (%) 26 ± 3 17 ± 2 15 ± 2 G** CTL > OLD*
CTL > IUGR**
Male 28 ± 3 16 ± 3 13 ± 3
Female 23 ± 4 19 ± 2 17 ± 2
RV‐WTF (%) 61 ± 3 45 ± 4 44 ± 5 G* CTL > OLD*
CTL > IUGR*
Male 61 ± 4 50 ± 8 44 ± 9
Female 61 ± 6 40 ± 4 43 ± 6
RV‐ESSI (%) 62 ± 6 38 ± 3 63 ± 5 G** CTL > OLD*
IUGR> OLD*
Male 63 ± 8 38 ± 5 60 ± 5
Female 61 ± 9 39 ± 3 66 ± 9
RV‐EDSI (%) 48 ± 4 35 ± 2 57 ± 4 G** CTL > OLD–
IUGR> OLD**
Male 43 ± 5 36 ± 4 59 ± 5
Female 53 ± 6 34 ± 2 56 ± 7
Normalized to body surface area (BSA)
RV‐ESV/BSA (ml m–2) 27.8 ± 8.6 28.6 ± 13.0 43.1 ± 16.1 G*** S*** CTL < IUGR**
OLD < IUGR**
M > F***
Male 30.6 ± 3.1 36.2 ± 5.5 52.0 ± 6.2
Female 25.1 ± 2.8 21.1 ± 2.9 33.7 ± 3.2
RV‐EDV/BSA (ml m–2) 54.4 ± 3.4 46.5 ± 4.8 63.1 ± 4.6 G** S*** OLD < IUGR**
M > F***
Male 58.7 ± 4.5 58.4 ± 5.9 76.1 ± 5.7
Female 50.0 ± 4.9 34.7 ± 3.4 50.1 ± 3.2
RV‐pWT/BSA (mm m–2) 8.4 ± 0.8 5.4 ± 0.2 5.9 ± 0.9 G* CTL > OLD*
CTL > IUGR–
Male 8.9 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 0.3 4.7 ± 0.9
Female 7.9 ± 1.1 5.4 ± 0.3 7.2 ± 1.4

G, group only; S, sex only; GS, group and sex; –P < 0.1; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.005. No significant sex‐group interaction was found. EDSI, end diastolic sphericity index; EDV, end diastolic volume; ESSI, end systolic sphericity index; ESV, end systolic volume; LSF, longitudinal shortening fraction; pWT, peak wall thickness; RV, right ventricular; WTF, wall thickening fraction.