Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Mod Pathol. 2015 Nov 13;29(1):25–33. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.128

Table 2. Clinicopathological and radiological variables correlation with upgrade for all 63 cases.

Upgrade

Yes (n = 15) No (n = 48)
Age (mean and range)
 52 (38,79) years 52 (41,72) years 52 (38,79) yea
Race
 African American (n = 4) 1 (7) 3 (6)
 Caucasian (n =59) 14 (93) 45 (94)
Menopause status
 Post (n =31)a 7 (47) 24 (50)
 Pre (n = 29) 8 (53) 21 (25)
Mass vs non-mass
 Mass (n = 24) 3 (20) 21 (25)
 Non-mass (n = 39) 12 (80) 27 (56)
Reason for MRI
 BIRAD 3 (n = 6) 1 (6.7) 5 (10)
 Staging (n = 28) 8 (53) 20 (42)
 High risk (n = 28) 6 (40) 22 (46)
 Clinical (n = 1) 0 (0) 1 (2)
ILC vs IC-NST or DCIS
 IC-NST or DCIS (n = 32) 5 (33) 27 (56)
 ILC (n = 10) 4 (27) 6 (13)
Concurrent vs past
 Concurrent (n = 32) 6 (40) 26 (54)
 Past (n = 10) 3 (20) 7 (15)
Ipsilateral vs contralateral
 Contralateral (n = 20) 2 (13) 18 (38)
 Ipsilateral (n = 22) 7 (47) 15 (31)
Pure LN vs mixedb
 Mixed (n = 29) 4 (27) 25 (52)
 Pure (n = 34) 11 (73) 23 (48)

Abbreviations: DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; IC-NST, invasive carcinoma of no special type; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; LN, lobular neoplasia; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

a

Three patients were perimenopausal.

b

LN mixed with other types of atypia. All of the comparisons were not statistically significant.