Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Mod Pathol. 2015 Nov 13;29(1):25–33. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.128

Table 3. Clinicopathological and radiological variables correlation with upgrade for pure LN cases.

Variables Upgrade P-value

Yes (n = 11) No (n = 23)
Age (mean and range)
 52 (41,77) years 51 (41,72) years 52 (41,77) years NS
Race
 African American (n = 1) 0 (0) 1 (4) NS
 Caucasian (n = 33) 11 (100) 22 (96)
Menopause status
 Post (n = 13)a 4 (36) 9 (39) NS
 Pre (n = 19) 7 (64) 12 (52)
Mass vs non-mass
 Mass (n = 12) 2 (18) 10 (44) NS
 Non-mass (n = 22) 9 (82) 13 (57)
Reason for MRI
 BIRAD 3 (n = 4) 1 (9) 3 (13) NS
 Clinical (n = 11) 4 (36) 7 (30)
 High risk (n = 18) 6 (55) 12 (52)
 Staging (n = 1) 0 (0) 1 (4.3)
ILC vs IC-NST or DCIS
 IC-NST or DCIS (n = 16) 4 (36) 12 (52) NS
 ILC (n = 7) 3 (27) 4 (17)
Concurrent vs past
 Concurrent (n = 18) 5 (46) 13 (57) NS
 Past (n = 5) 2 (18) 3 (13)
Ipsilateral vs contralateral
 Contralateral (n = 12) 1 (9) 11 (48) 0.03
 Ipsilateral (n = 11) 6 (55) 5 (22)

Abbreviations: DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; IC-NST, invasive carcinoma of no special type; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; LN, lobular neoplasia; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NS, not significant.

a

Two patients were perimenopausal.