Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 30;8:1019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01019

Table 6.

Correlation table for Study 4.

ID with women ID with feminists Femininity Modern sexism Hostile sexism Benevolent sexism Descriptive problematic Descriptive true Prescriptive problematic Prescriptive true Anti speaker
ID with feminists Correlation 0.27 1
Significance 0.000
Femininity Correlation 0.57 0.22 1
Significance 0.000 0.002
Modern Correlation 0.14 0.50 0.09 1
Significance 0.052 0.000 0.203
Hostile Correlation −0.08 −0.49 0.01 −0.38 1
Significance 0.293 0.000 0.939 0.000
Benevolent Correlation −0.01 −0.30 0.10 −0.25 0.83 1
Significance 0.868 0.000 0.150 0.000 0.000
Descriptive problematic Correlation −0.12 0.12 −0.09 0.15 −0.16 −0.20 1
Significance 0.089 0.088 0.222 0.036 0.023 0.005
Descriptive true Correlation 0.14 −0.14 0.12 −0.14 0.41 0.40 −0.30 1
Significance 0.044 0.045 0.105 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prescriptive problematic Correlation −0.003 0.18 −0.04 0.35 −0.27 −0.27 0.29 −0.22 1
Significance 0.969 0.013 0.627 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002
Prescriptive true Correlation −0.04 −0.13 0.03 −0.24 0.42 0.48 −0.09 0.28 −0.51 1
Significance 0.587 0.078 0.687 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.203 0.000 0.000
Anti speaker Correlation 0.21 0.16 0.11 0.14 −0.1 0.01 −0.02 −0.02 −0.06 0.02 1
Significance 0.003 0.023 0.139 0.049 0.168 0.855 0.834 0.747 0.392 0.754
Pro speaker Correlation 0.2 0.25 0.12 0.24 −0.17 −0.11 0.04 −0.04 0.23 −0.21 −0.05
Significance 0.003 0.000 0.083 0.001 0.018 0.135 0.591 0.623 0.001 0.003 0.518