Skip to main content
. 2017 May 31;17(6):1252. doi: 10.3390/s17061252

Table 2.

Percentage of correct decisions for the healthy structure and the structure with Damages 1, 2 and 3, for the twenty different machine learning strategies (composite plate).

Machine Name Healthy Damage 1 Damage 2 Damage 3
Medium Tree 55.00% 63.33% 60.83% 52.50%
Simple Tree 40.00% 60.00% 63.33% 42.50%
Complex Tree 57.50% 64.17% 75.83% 65.83%
Linear SVM 41.67% 59.17% 45.00% 47.50%
Quadratic SVM 65.83% 73.33% 85.00% 75.50%
Cubic SVM 70.83% 75.00% 86.67% 74.17%
Fine Gaussian SVM 59.17% 64.17% 83.33% 78.33%
Medium Gaussian SVM 55.83% 60.00% 82.50% 63.33%
Coarse Gaussian SVM 52.50% 10.83% 33.33% 56.67%
Fine k-NN 63.33% 61.67% 80.00% 70.00%
Medium k-NN 65.00% 46.67% 75.00% 63.33%
Coarse k-NN 52.50% 37.50% 60.83% 35.83%
Cosine k-NN 65.00% 43.33% 79.17% 60.83%
Cubic k-NN 59.17% 47.50% 72.50% 60.00%
Weighted k-NN 61.67% 58.33% 83.33% 74.17%
Boosted Trees 16.67% 62.50% 60.83% 71.67%
Bagged Trees 71.67% 72.50% 90.00% 84.17%
Subspace Discriminant 33.33% 45.83% 45.00% 55.83%
Subspace k-NN 70.83% 72.50% 89.17% 82.50%
Rusboosted Trees 0.00% 62.50% 0.00% 93.33%