Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 11;20(7):562–574. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx010

Table 1.

5-CSRTT Baseline Performance in the WT, D1-/-, and D3-/- Mice

WT D1 -/- D3 -/- ANOVA
Accuracy (%) 90.58±3.39 10.51±2.43*** 45.11±16.43**, ## F2, 45 = 32.56, P < .0001
Omission (%) 18.08±2.79 81.24±7.76*** 16.03±3.43### F2, 45 = 51.7, P < .0001
Premature response 7.0±1.89 0.21±0.08 14.57±4.22*, # F2, 45 = 5.77, P = .0138
Correct response lat. (s) 0.68±0.06 17.05±4.38*** 0.28±0.16## F2, 45 = 34.45, P < .0001
Perseverative response 7.1±1.79 0.16±0.1*** 0.77±0.24** F2, 45 = 12.78, P = .0006
Timeout response 22±6.89 2.1±1.26* 17.5±6.95 F2, 45 = 3.884, P = .0412
Feeder lat. (s) 1.18±0.16 13.18±1.4** 1.11±0.21### F2, 45 = 70.52, P < .0001
Trials completed 91.67±4.02 5.72±1.28*** 67.19±3.96***, ### F2, 45 = 271.5, P < .0001

Data are mean±SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s posthoc test was used to analyze difference between genotypes. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .0001, compared with WT mice. #P < .05, ##P < .01, ###P < .0001, compared between D1-/- and D3-/- mice.