Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0179870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179870

Table 3. Comparisons of treatment outcomes in patients with late and non-late combination antiretroviral therapy initiation.

Outcomes Patients with late initiation (n = 1278) Patients with non-late initiation (n = 2377) HR (95% CI) P
All-cause mortality, n (%) 22 (1.7) 6 (0.3) 6.86 (2.78–16.91) <0.001
Regimen modification, n (%)* 598 (46.8) 1041 (43.8) 1.10 (0.99–1.21) 0.077
    Adverse event 422 (33.0) 834 (35.1) 0.94 (0.83–1.05) 0.264
    Treatment failure** 120 (9.4) 120 (5.1) 2.02 (1.56–2.61) <0.001
      Virological failure 91 (7.1) 62 (2.6) 2.82 (2.04–3.90) <0.001
        Baseline PVL ≥100,000 69 (5.4) 24 (1.0) 2.04 (1.28–3.25) 0.003
        copies/mL
        Baseline PVL <100,000 22 (1.7) 38 (1.6) 2.27 (1.34–3.84) 0.002
        copies/mL
      Loss to follow-up or 29 (2.3) 58 (2.4) 1.03 (0.64–1.64) 0.911
      interruption
    Simplification 47 (3.7) 70 (2.9) 1.23 (0.85–1.78) 0.281
    Others 14 (1.1) 20 (0.8) 1.21 (0.60–2.43) 0.591

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PVL, plasma HIV RNA load.

*Regimen modification included the removal, addition, and switch of at least one antiretroviral drug from the initial cART regimen, and loss to follow-up within 6 months after starting cART.

**The causes of treatment failure included virological failure, loss to follow-up, and cART interruption. Virological failure was defined as a PVL >200 copies/mL at least 6 months after starting cART.